Anti-Crisis Industrial Policy of the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Andrey Vyacheslavovich Koshkin, Maksim Yur'evich Shcheglov, George Aleksandrovich Bit-Zaya, Anastasia Sergeevna Kalinichenko, Diana Maksimovna Mikhaleva
{"title":"Anti-Crisis Industrial Policy of the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Andrey Vyacheslavovich Koshkin, Maksim Yur'evich Shcheglov, George Aleksandrovich Bit-Zaya, Anastasia Sergeevna Kalinichenko, Diana Maksimovna Mikhaleva","doi":"10.25136/2409-7802.2024.1.69641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The COVID-19 pandemic was one of the first “black swan” for the global economy. Regional authorities in Russia were faced to support their regional economies but they were faced with uncharacteristic independence. The issue of assessing the effectiveness of regional anti-crisis industrial policy measures in Russia during the COVID-19 crisis is becoming urgent. The purpose of this study is to search for the most successful measures of regional support in Russia during the designated period. The study is based on the conceptual framework of the St. Petersburg School of Industrial Policy. Descriptive statistics, cluster analysis, and correlation analysis are used as statistical methods of analysis. 1196 anti-crisis industrial policy measures were classified in all 85 regions of the Russian Federation. A scatter diagram of regions was constructed with indicators of the scale for assessing the intensity of the anti-crisis industrial policy and the scale of the impact of the crisis on socio-economic indicators. Four clusters were identified: (1) regions that practically did not implement an anti-crisis industrial policy and suffered during the crisis; (2) regions that have significant economic stability and are less likely to resort to active anti-crisis policies; (3) regions, the values of indicators of the dynamics of socio-economic indicators of which are at an average and below level, but are pursuing, on average, a more intensive anti-crisis policy; (4) regions that pursued an active anti-crisis industrial policy and achieved good socio-economic indicators. Correlation analysis did not reveal a stable connection between the intensity of the anti-crisis policy and the crisis dynamics of socio-economic indicators. The study also presents leading regions and outsider regions in terms of anti-crisis industrial policy measures for each of the 4 clusters.\n","PeriodicalId":233653,"journal":{"name":"Финансы и управление","volume":"29 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Финансы и управление","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7802.2024.1.69641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic was one of the first “black swan” for the global economy. Regional authorities in Russia were faced to support their regional economies but they were faced with uncharacteristic independence. The issue of assessing the effectiveness of regional anti-crisis industrial policy measures in Russia during the COVID-19 crisis is becoming urgent. The purpose of this study is to search for the most successful measures of regional support in Russia during the designated period. The study is based on the conceptual framework of the St. Petersburg School of Industrial Policy. Descriptive statistics, cluster analysis, and correlation analysis are used as statistical methods of analysis. 1196 anti-crisis industrial policy measures were classified in all 85 regions of the Russian Federation. A scatter diagram of regions was constructed with indicators of the scale for assessing the intensity of the anti-crisis industrial policy and the scale of the impact of the crisis on socio-economic indicators. Four clusters were identified: (1) regions that practically did not implement an anti-crisis industrial policy and suffered during the crisis; (2) regions that have significant economic stability and are less likely to resort to active anti-crisis policies; (3) regions, the values of indicators of the dynamics of socio-economic indicators of which are at an average and below level, but are pursuing, on average, a more intensive anti-crisis policy; (4) regions that pursued an active anti-crisis industrial policy and achieved good socio-economic indicators. Correlation analysis did not reveal a stable connection between the intensity of the anti-crisis policy and the crisis dynamics of socio-economic indicators. The study also presents leading regions and outsider regions in terms of anti-crisis industrial policy measures for each of the 4 clusters.
COVID-19 大流行期间俄罗斯联邦各主体的反危机工业政策
COVID-19 大流行是全球经济的第一只 "黑天鹅"。俄罗斯的地区当局面临着支持其地区经济的问题,但却面临着非同寻常的独立性。在 COVID-19 危机期间,评估俄罗斯地区反危机产业政策措施的有效性已成为当务之急。本研究的目的是寻找指定时期俄罗斯最成功的地区支持措施。本研究以圣彼得堡工业政策学派的概念框架为基础。统计分析方法包括描述性统计、聚类分析和相关分析。对俄罗斯联邦所有 85 个地区的 1196 项反危机工业政策措施进行了分类。利用评估反危机产业政策强度的规模指标和危机对社会经济指标影响的规模指标,构建了地区散点图。确定了四个群组:(1) 实际上没有实施反危机产业政策并在危机中遭受损失的地区;(2) 经济非常稳定,不太可能采取积极的反危机政策的地区;(3) 社会经济指标动态指标值处于平均水平和低于平均水平,但平均而言正在实施更加密集的反危机政策的地区;(4) 实施积极的反危机产业政策并取得良好的社会经济指标的地区。相关分析表明,反危机政策的力度与社会经济指标的危机动态之间没有稳定的联系。研究还介绍了 4 个组群中每个组群在反危机产业政策措施方面的领先地区和落后地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信