Arthroscopic Posterior Bone Block Technique for Posterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss

S. Swinehart, Ryan H. Barnes, Hanna Sorensen, J. Bishop, Grant L. Jones, Greg L. Cvetanovich
{"title":"Arthroscopic Posterior Bone Block Technique for Posterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss","authors":"S. Swinehart, Ryan H. Barnes, Hanna Sorensen, J. Bishop, Grant L. Jones, Greg L. Cvetanovich","doi":"10.1177/26350254231193028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Posterior instability can be difficult to treat if there is associated bone loss and debate remains about the amount of bone loss that requires intervention. Arthroscopic posterior bone block technique is useful for recurrent posterior instability with bone loss. It is reserved for patients who have failed soft tissue stabilization with bone loss greater than 10%. After diagnostic arthroscopy, an anterior-superior portal is established. A 30° scope is utilized, although, a 70° scope can be used. The posterior labrum is elevated and dissection is carried along the posterior glenoid neck. If an anterior labral tear is encountered, labral repair is performed. The posterior glenoid is cleared to allow for bone block seating. A fresh, non-frozen distal tibial allograft is prepared to size. Fixation can include screw or button fixation. Other types of fixation can be utilized including tightrope-type fixation, but screws are our preference. We have not had any complications with screw fixation. The graft is predrilled and assembled to the delivery device. A posterior incision is made and dissection is carried under the capsule and labrum to allow for shuttling. The bone block is fixed using two 3.5-mm cannulated screws. After fixation, anchors are placed and remaining capsule and labrum are shifted up to overly the bone block. Postoperative immobilization can be utilized with a standard UltraSling or a gunslinger brace. We typically do not obtain a computed tomography (CT) scan prior to return to activity. There is little literature on arthroscopic posterior bone block, but early results are promising. Distal tibia allograft use in anterior instability has good outcomes and rates of union. Open posterior procedures demonstrate a recurrent dislocation risk of 10%. Current literature supports a similar rate in arthroscopically. Furthermore, there is a learning curve. Complications are similar to open complications, including graft resorption, fixation failure, recurrent dislocation, continued shoulder pain, and glenohumeral arthritis. In our experience, we have not had any wound complications. Arthroscopic posterior bone block augmentation presents a reliable technique for posterior instability with associated glenoid bone loss. The use of distal tibia allograft minimizes donor site morbidity. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.","PeriodicalId":201842,"journal":{"name":"Video Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254231193028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Posterior instability can be difficult to treat if there is associated bone loss and debate remains about the amount of bone loss that requires intervention. Arthroscopic posterior bone block technique is useful for recurrent posterior instability with bone loss. It is reserved for patients who have failed soft tissue stabilization with bone loss greater than 10%. After diagnostic arthroscopy, an anterior-superior portal is established. A 30° scope is utilized, although, a 70° scope can be used. The posterior labrum is elevated and dissection is carried along the posterior glenoid neck. If an anterior labral tear is encountered, labral repair is performed. The posterior glenoid is cleared to allow for bone block seating. A fresh, non-frozen distal tibial allograft is prepared to size. Fixation can include screw or button fixation. Other types of fixation can be utilized including tightrope-type fixation, but screws are our preference. We have not had any complications with screw fixation. The graft is predrilled and assembled to the delivery device. A posterior incision is made and dissection is carried under the capsule and labrum to allow for shuttling. The bone block is fixed using two 3.5-mm cannulated screws. After fixation, anchors are placed and remaining capsule and labrum are shifted up to overly the bone block. Postoperative immobilization can be utilized with a standard UltraSling or a gunslinger brace. We typically do not obtain a computed tomography (CT) scan prior to return to activity. There is little literature on arthroscopic posterior bone block, but early results are promising. Distal tibia allograft use in anterior instability has good outcomes and rates of union. Open posterior procedures demonstrate a recurrent dislocation risk of 10%. Current literature supports a similar rate in arthroscopically. Furthermore, there is a learning curve. Complications are similar to open complications, including graft resorption, fixation failure, recurrent dislocation, continued shoulder pain, and glenohumeral arthritis. In our experience, we have not had any wound complications. Arthroscopic posterior bone block augmentation presents a reliable technique for posterior instability with associated glenoid bone loss. The use of distal tibia allograft minimizes donor site morbidity. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
关节镜后方骨块技术治疗盂骨缺失的肩关节后方失稳
如果伴有骨质流失,后方不稳就很难治疗,对于需要干预的骨质流失量仍存在争议。关节镜后方骨块技术适用于骨质流失的复发性后方失稳。该技术适用于软组织稳定失败且骨质流失超过10%的患者。关节镜诊断后,建立一个前上方入口。使用 30° 镜,也可使用 70° 镜。抬高后唇缘,沿后盂颈进行剥离。如果遇到前唇撕裂,则进行唇修复。清理盂后部,以便骨块就位。按尺寸准备新鲜、非冷冻的胫骨远端同种异体移植物。固定方式包括螺钉或纽扣固定。也可以使用其他类型的固定方式,包括钢丝固定,但我们更倾向于使用螺钉固定。我们在使用螺钉固定时没有遇到过任何并发症。移植物已预先钻孔并装配到输送装置上。后方切口,在关节囊和盂唇下进行剥离,以便穿梭。使用两个 3.5 毫米的套管螺钉固定骨块。固定后,放置锚,并将剩余的囊和唇上移,以覆盖骨块。术后固定可以使用标准的 UltraSling 或枪手支架。在恢复活动之前,我们通常不会进行计算机断层扫描(CT)。关于关节镜后骨块的文献很少,但早期结果很有希望。胫骨远端同种异体移植用于前方不稳定的治疗效果和结合率都很好。开放性后路手术的复发脱位风险为10%。目前的文献支持关节镜手术也有类似的风险。此外,还存在学习曲线。并发症与开放手术并发症相似,包括移植物吸收、固定失败、复发性脱位、持续肩痛和盂肱关节炎。根据我们的经验,没有出现过任何伤口并发症。关节镜后方骨块增量术是一种可靠的技术,可用于治疗伴有盂骨缺失的后方不稳定。使用胫骨远端同种异体移植可将供体部位的发病率降至最低。作者证明已征得本出版物中出现的任何患者的同意。如果个人身份可能被识别,作者已将患者的免责声明或其他书面形式的同意书与本论文一同提交发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信