Can we achieve equitable learning beyond hierarchical measurement? Challenges in the era of lifelong learning

Q3 Social Sciences
Shoko Yamada
{"title":"Can we achieve equitable learning beyond hierarchical measurement? Challenges in the era of lifelong learning","authors":"Shoko Yamada","doi":"10.1177/2212585x241242522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the UN passed its Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, there has been a seemingly commonsense equation between schooling and education, and access to quality schooling is considered to mean the assurance of educational rights. Against such an assumption, this paper demonstrates the complex nature of educational equity in the modern world, where the demands for knowledge are in constant flux. If the purpose of education is solely to acquire knowledge, learning can occur outside the institutionalized school system. However, individuals and societies place a high value on formal education and its credentials, which intensifies the competition for higher and better education. The simple equation of educational rights with schooling has a risk of fanning such thirst for credentials rather than equalizing opportunities. The author argues that the world culture of schooling and international tests have contributed to standardizing the popular aspiration globally along the axes of years in school and test results. In today’s dynamic world, individuals have to continue learning throughout their lives to catch up with changing demands for knowledge. Therefore, the concept of equity should be more in line with individuals’ motivations and contexts of learning than with the access to and quality of educational institutions.","PeriodicalId":37881,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Education","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585x241242522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the UN passed its Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, there has been a seemingly commonsense equation between schooling and education, and access to quality schooling is considered to mean the assurance of educational rights. Against such an assumption, this paper demonstrates the complex nature of educational equity in the modern world, where the demands for knowledge are in constant flux. If the purpose of education is solely to acquire knowledge, learning can occur outside the institutionalized school system. However, individuals and societies place a high value on formal education and its credentials, which intensifies the competition for higher and better education. The simple equation of educational rights with schooling has a risk of fanning such thirst for credentials rather than equalizing opportunities. The author argues that the world culture of schooling and international tests have contributed to standardizing the popular aspiration globally along the axes of years in school and test results. In today’s dynamic world, individuals have to continue learning throughout their lives to catch up with changing demands for knowledge. Therefore, the concept of equity should be more in line with individuals’ motivations and contexts of learning than with the access to and quality of educational institutions.
我们能否实现超越等级衡量的公平学习?终身学习时代的挑战
自联合国于 1948 年通过《世界人权宣言》以来,学校教育与教育之间似乎存在着一个常识性的等号,接受优质学校教育被认为意味着教育权利的保障。针对这一假设,本文论证了在知识需求不断变化的现代社会中教育公平的复杂性。如果教育的目的仅仅是获取知识,那么学习可以在制度化的学校系统之外进行。然而,个人和社会高度重视正规教育及其证书,这加剧了对更高、更好教育的竞争。简单地将教育权等同于学校教育,有可能加剧这种对证书的渴求,而不是实现机会均等。作者认为,世界学校教育文化和国际考试助长了以在校年数和考试成绩为轴心的全球大众愿望的标准化。在当今这个充满活力的世界,个人必须终生不断学习,才能跟上不断变化的知识需求。因此,公平的概念应更符合个人的学习动机和背景,而不是教育机构的入学机会和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Chinese Education
International Journal of Chinese Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Chinese Education (IJCE) is a result of the collaboration between Brill Academic Publishers and the Institute of Education at Tsinghua University. It aims to strengthen Chinese academic exchanges and cooperation with other countries in order to improve Chinese educational research and promote Chinese educational development. Through collaboration among scholars in and outside of China who are dedicated to the investigation of Chinese education, this journal aims to raise Chinese educational research levels, further recognize and solve Chinese educational problems, inform Chinese educational policies and decisions, and promote Chinese educational reform and development. This journal welcomes empirical as well as theoretical studies on particular educational issues and/or policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信