{"title":"Investigation of the purpose, functions and tasks of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses","authors":"Vitaliy Ivanovich Ivanov","doi":"10.7256/2306-9945.2024.1.69771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The object of the study is the general purpose and function, as well as the tasks of the proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. The interdependence and relativity of the concepts of \"purpose\" and \"task\" of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses cause difficulties in establishing their distinctive features and mutual differentiation, and therefore the issue of defining these categories in the science of administrative law is currently debatable. For this reason, the works of prominent Russian jurists such as D. N. Bakhrah, V. V. Dorokhin, S. D. Mogilevsky, A. Y. Yakimovich, revealing the content and essence of these concepts from different sides, formed the subject of this study. The specificity of the research object was a decisive factor in determining the research methodology. In preparing the article, a set of general scientific and private scientific methods was used, including the method of system analysis, which ensured the validity of the author's judgments, suggestions and recommendations. Within the framework of a systematic analysis, directing the research process from a complex to a simpler manifestation of the object of research, the author, based on the patterns of formation of tree-like hierarchical structures, reveals the content of the above concepts in an original way, defines the general law-restoring nature of production, identifies the law enforcement stages in it, as well as the goals and special tasks of each stage. As a result of the research, the author's version of Article 24.1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation is proposed, which establishes a legal definition of the purpose of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. Proposals for improving the current legislation indicate the applied significance of this study, while some conclusions and theoretical generalizations of the author can be used to conduct further research in this direction.\n","PeriodicalId":262036,"journal":{"name":"NB: Административное право и практика администрирования","volume":"17 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NB: Административное право и практика администрирования","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2306-9945.2024.1.69771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The object of the study is the general purpose and function, as well as the tasks of the proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. The interdependence and relativity of the concepts of "purpose" and "task" of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses cause difficulties in establishing their distinctive features and mutual differentiation, and therefore the issue of defining these categories in the science of administrative law is currently debatable. For this reason, the works of prominent Russian jurists such as D. N. Bakhrah, V. V. Dorokhin, S. D. Mogilevsky, A. Y. Yakimovich, revealing the content and essence of these concepts from different sides, formed the subject of this study. The specificity of the research object was a decisive factor in determining the research methodology. In preparing the article, a set of general scientific and private scientific methods was used, including the method of system analysis, which ensured the validity of the author's judgments, suggestions and recommendations. Within the framework of a systematic analysis, directing the research process from a complex to a simpler manifestation of the object of research, the author, based on the patterns of formation of tree-like hierarchical structures, reveals the content of the above concepts in an original way, defines the general law-restoring nature of production, identifies the law enforcement stages in it, as well as the goals and special tasks of each stage. As a result of the research, the author's version of Article 24.1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation is proposed, which establishes a legal definition of the purpose of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. Proposals for improving the current legislation indicate the applied significance of this study, while some conclusions and theoretical generalizations of the author can be used to conduct further research in this direction.
研究对象是行政违法案件诉讼程序的一般目的和功能以及任务。行政违法案件诉讼程序的 "目的 "和 "任务 "这两个概念之间的相互依存性和相对性给确定它们的显著特征和相互区别造成了困难,因此目前在行政法学中对这两个类别的定义问题还存在争议。因此,俄罗斯著名法学家 D. N. Bakhrah、V. V. Dorokhin、S. D. Mogilevsky、A. Y. Yakimovich 等人的著作从不同侧面揭示了这些概念的内容和本质,构成了本研究的主题。研究对象的特殊性是确定研究方法的决定性因素。在撰写文章时,使用了一整套一般科学方法和私人科学方法,包括系统分析方法,这确保了作者的判断、意见和建议的有效性。在系统分析的框架内,将研究过程从研究对象的复杂表现形式引向简单表现形式,作者根据树状层次结构的形成规律,以独创的方式揭示了上述概念的内涵,界定了生产的一般法律恢复性质,确定了其中的执法阶段,以及每个阶段的目标和特殊任务。作为研究成果,提出了作者版本的《俄罗斯联邦行政违法法典》第 24.1 条,该条规定了行政违法案件诉讼目的的法律定义。关于完善现行立法的建议表明了本研究的应用意义,而作者的一些结论和理论概括可用于在这一方向开展进一步的研究。