Tax In History: CFCs and Tax Treaties: Historical Elements for the IIR Debate

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
Intertax Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2024007
Ricardo André Galendi Júnior, Pedro Guilherme Lindenberg Schoueri
{"title":"Tax In History: CFCs and Tax Treaties: Historical Elements for the IIR Debate","authors":"Ricardo André Galendi Júnior, Pedro Guilherme Lindenberg Schoueri","doi":"10.54648/taxi2024007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article revisits the OECD Commentary’s position on the compatibility of CFC rules and tax treaties from a historical perspective. It highlights that the key (technical) argument behind the compatibility endorsed by the Commentary rests on the anti-abuse character of the rule. This backdrop is of relevance for the analysis of rules that purport to have a similar mechanism but that lack the anti-abuse character – including worldwide income taxation rules and the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) under Pillar 2. The article posits that these situations are beyond the scope of the ‘technical argument’ and, therefore, cannot rely on the OECD Commentary to support their compatibility with tax treaties.\nControlled foreign corporation rules, tax treaties, income inclusion rule, worldwide taxation","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2024007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article revisits the OECD Commentary’s position on the compatibility of CFC rules and tax treaties from a historical perspective. It highlights that the key (technical) argument behind the compatibility endorsed by the Commentary rests on the anti-abuse character of the rule. This backdrop is of relevance for the analysis of rules that purport to have a similar mechanism but that lack the anti-abuse character – including worldwide income taxation rules and the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) under Pillar 2. The article posits that these situations are beyond the scope of the ‘technical argument’ and, therefore, cannot rely on the OECD Commentary to support their compatibility with tax treaties. Controlled foreign corporation rules, tax treaties, income inclusion rule, worldwide taxation
历史上的税收:商品共同基金和税务条约:国际投资协定辩论的历史要素
本文从历史的角度重新审视了经合组织评注中关于氟氯化碳规则与税务条约兼容性的立场。文章强调,评注所认可的兼容性背后的关键(技术)论据在于规则的反滥用特性。这一背景对于分析声称具有类似机制但缺乏反滥用特性的规则--包括全球所得税规则和第二支柱下的收入包含规则(IIR)--具有现实意义。文章认为,这些情况超出了 "技术论证 "的范围,因此不能依靠《经合组织评注》来支持其与税收协定的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信