Quality Assessment of Clinical Guidelines for Preventing Falls in Hospitalized Elderly People in Iran Using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE) Checklist

Salmand Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.32598/sija.2023.3544.1
Mahsa Soleimani, Maryam Shirazi, M. Keshvari
{"title":"Quality Assessment of Clinical Guidelines for Preventing Falls in Hospitalized Elderly People in Iran Using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE) Checklist","authors":"Mahsa Soleimani, Maryam Shirazi, M. Keshvari","doi":"10.32598/sija.2023.3544.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Hospitalization is a vulnerable period for the elderly. During this period, they are at risk of falling. There are various clinical guidelines for fall prevention, whose usefulness depends on their quality and clinical acceptance. This study was to evaluate the methodological quality of selected clinical guidelines for fall prevention in hospitalized elderly people in Iran using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE) checklist. Methods & Materials A systematic search was conducted for clinical guidelines published from 2009 to 2020 using the keywords clinical guideline, falling, prevention, aged, and hospitalization. Of 351 clinical guidelines identified, 4 guidelines were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and by a purposive sampling method. The quality of the selected guidelines was evaluated by 5 experts independently using the AGREE II checklist. Based on the quality scores, the guidelines were categorized as “highly recommended” or “recommended with modifications”. Results The \"Falls Assessment and Prevention of Falls in Older People\", \"Preventing Falls and Harm From Falls in Older People\", and \"Preventing Falls and Reducing Injury from Falls\" were categorized as highly recommended, while the \"Post Fall Multidisciplinary Management Guidelines for Western Australian Health Care Settings\" was categorized as “recommended with modifications”. Therefore, they can be localized and used to reduce the risk of falls in hospitalized elderly people in Iran. The mean overall scores of 6 domains for the guidelines were as follows: 91. 1% for “clarity of presentation”, 86. 6% for “scope and purpose”, 83. 6% for “stakeholder involvement” 72. 08% for “editorial independence”, 71. 14% for “rigor of development”, and 66. 66% for “applicability”. Conclusion Evaluation of the methodological quality of clinical guidelines using the AGREE tool should be done to be able to be used in clinical practice. It is recommended to use these tools in updating the current or future clinical guidelines to ensure their methodological quality.","PeriodicalId":512181,"journal":{"name":"Salmand","volume":"23 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salmand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.2023.3544.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Hospitalization is a vulnerable period for the elderly. During this period, they are at risk of falling. There are various clinical guidelines for fall prevention, whose usefulness depends on their quality and clinical acceptance. This study was to evaluate the methodological quality of selected clinical guidelines for fall prevention in hospitalized elderly people in Iran using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE) checklist. Methods & Materials A systematic search was conducted for clinical guidelines published from 2009 to 2020 using the keywords clinical guideline, falling, prevention, aged, and hospitalization. Of 351 clinical guidelines identified, 4 guidelines were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and by a purposive sampling method. The quality of the selected guidelines was evaluated by 5 experts independently using the AGREE II checklist. Based on the quality scores, the guidelines were categorized as “highly recommended” or “recommended with modifications”. Results The "Falls Assessment and Prevention of Falls in Older People", "Preventing Falls and Harm From Falls in Older People", and "Preventing Falls and Reducing Injury from Falls" were categorized as highly recommended, while the "Post Fall Multidisciplinary Management Guidelines for Western Australian Health Care Settings" was categorized as “recommended with modifications”. Therefore, they can be localized and used to reduce the risk of falls in hospitalized elderly people in Iran. The mean overall scores of 6 domains for the guidelines were as follows: 91. 1% for “clarity of presentation”, 86. 6% for “scope and purpose”, 83. 6% for “stakeholder involvement” 72. 08% for “editorial independence”, 71. 14% for “rigor of development”, and 66. 66% for “applicability”. Conclusion Evaluation of the methodological quality of clinical guidelines using the AGREE tool should be done to be able to be used in clinical practice. It is recommended to use these tools in updating the current or future clinical guidelines to ensure their methodological quality.
使用 "指南、研究和评价评估(AGREE)核对表 "对伊朗预防住院老年人跌倒的临床指南进行质量评估
目标 住院治疗是老年人的脆弱时期。在此期间,他们有跌倒的风险。目前有多种预防跌倒的临床指南,其实用性取决于指南的质量和临床认可度。本研究采用指南、研究和评价评估(AGREE)核对表,对伊朗选定的住院老人跌倒预防临床指南的方法学质量进行评估。方法与材料 以临床指南、跌倒、预防、老年人和住院为关键词,对 2009 年至 2020 年间发布的临床指南进行了系统检索。在确定的 351 份临床指南中,根据纳入和排除标准,采用目的性抽样方法选出了 4 份指南。所选指南的质量由 5 位专家使用 AGREE II 检查表进行独立评估。根据质量评分,指南被分为 "强烈推荐 "和 "建议修改 "两类。结果 "老年人跌倒评估与预防"、"预防老年人跌倒及跌倒造成的伤害 "和 "预防跌倒及减少跌倒造成的伤害 "被归类为 "强烈推荐",而 "西澳大利亚医疗机构跌倒后多学科管理指南 "被归类为 "修改后推荐"。因此,可以将这些指南本地化,用于降低伊朗住院老年人的跌倒风险。该指南 6 个领域的平均总得分如下:91.1%,"表述清晰度 "为 86.6%,"范围和目的 "83.6%,"利益相关者参与 "72.08% 为 "编辑独立性",71.14% 为 "编制的严谨性",66.66%为 "适用性"。结论 应使用 AGREE 工具对临床指南的方法学质量进行评估,以便在临床实践中使用。建议在更新当前或未来的临床指南时使用这些工具,以确保其方法学质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信