Biopolymeric membrane - a new concept in guided bone regeneration. Series of cases

Vasile Zugrav, Dumitru Chele, G. Motelica, A. Mostovei, Ion Dabija, Nicolae Chele
{"title":"Biopolymeric membrane - a new concept in guided bone regeneration. Series of cases","authors":"Vasile Zugrav, Dumitru Chele, G. Motelica, A. Mostovei, Ion Dabija, Nicolae Chele","doi":"10.53530/1857-1328.23.1.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Different types of resorbable and non-resorbable membranes, cortical autogenous and allogenic bone plates, and prefabricated and perforated titanium meshes are currently used as guidance and support materials. All these devices present a series of advantages, but also disadvantages, such as gingival dehiscence with exposure and superinfection, additional trauma, and complete resorption of the bone graft. The objective of the study. This study emphasizes the importance of resorbable biopolymeric membranes in GBR. The retrospectively and descriptive analyses of the technique at 6 months postoperative time on a series of cases were performed. Materials and methods. GBR with resorbable biopolymer mesh was performed in 15 patients in 18 graft sites. Was analyzed just graft sites without any complication. The density of the newly formed bone under the augmentation membrane was evaluated postoperatively at 6 months using computed tomography (CBCT) according to the Hounsfield scale. Results. Results were interpreted in 18 graft sites and were evaluated at 6 months by paraclinical CBCT examination. After the polymer mesh GBR procedure, the mean radiodensity of the new bone obtained in the 18 sites was 1805 HU and the radiodensity of the native cortical bone next to the bone graft was 1793.4 HU","PeriodicalId":122574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatological Medicine","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53530/1857-1328.23.1.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Different types of resorbable and non-resorbable membranes, cortical autogenous and allogenic bone plates, and prefabricated and perforated titanium meshes are currently used as guidance and support materials. All these devices present a series of advantages, but also disadvantages, such as gingival dehiscence with exposure and superinfection, additional trauma, and complete resorption of the bone graft. The objective of the study. This study emphasizes the importance of resorbable biopolymeric membranes in GBR. The retrospectively and descriptive analyses of the technique at 6 months postoperative time on a series of cases were performed. Materials and methods. GBR with resorbable biopolymer mesh was performed in 15 patients in 18 graft sites. Was analyzed just graft sites without any complication. The density of the newly formed bone under the augmentation membrane was evaluated postoperatively at 6 months using computed tomography (CBCT) according to the Hounsfield scale. Results. Results were interpreted in 18 graft sites and were evaluated at 6 months by paraclinical CBCT examination. After the polymer mesh GBR procedure, the mean radiodensity of the new bone obtained in the 18 sites was 1805 HU and the radiodensity of the native cortical bone next to the bone graft was 1793.4 HU
生物聚合膜--引导骨再生的新概念。系列病例
导言。目前,不同类型的可吸收和不可吸收膜、皮质自体和异体骨板以及预制和穿孔钛网被用作引导和支持材料。所有这些装置都有一系列优点,但也有缺点,如牙龈开裂暴露和超级感染、额外的创伤和骨移植的完全吸收。本研究的目的。本研究强调了可吸收生物聚合物膜在 GBR 中的重要性。在术后 6 个月对一系列病例进行回顾性和描述性分析。材料和方法。在 15 名患者的 18 个移植部位使用可吸收生物聚合物网进行了 GBR。仅对未发生任何并发症的移植部位进行了分析。术后 6 个月,使用计算机断层扫描(CBCT)根据 Hounsfield 标度对增量膜下新形成骨的密度进行评估。结果。对 18 个移植部位的结果进行了解释,并在 6 个月时通过临床旁 CBCT 检查进行了评估。聚合物网 GBR 术后,18 个部位获得的新骨的平均放射密度为 1805 HU,植骨旁的原生皮质骨的放射密度为 1793.4 HU。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信