Outcome of macular hole surgery in a peripheral eye care facility of Nepal

Nitin Tulsyan, Mohamed Azzam, Ranjan Shah
{"title":"Outcome of macular hole surgery in a peripheral eye care facility of Nepal","authors":"Nitin Tulsyan, Mohamed Azzam, Ranjan Shah","doi":"10.33545/26638266.2024.v6.i1a.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Macular hole is a full thickness defect of the retina involving anatomical fovea, which is an important cause of central visual loss. Most common cause is idiopathic. The OCT has provided information regarding pathogenesis, classification and surgical success. Purpose: The objective of this study was to find out whether two types of hole closure would show different visual prognosis and to identify the correlation between size of macular hole and the type of closure. Patients and Methods: This study consisted of a retrospective consecutive series of patients who were operated for idiopathic macular hole in R.M. Kedia Eye Hospital from January 2022 to March 2023. Among 35 eyes operated for idiopathic macular hole in the mentioned time frame, 27 eyes of 27 patients with closed macular hole after the initial operation were included in this study. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative OCT examination of the macular lesion, including the measurement of the macular hole diameter. The successful closure of the macular hole was defined as a postoperative biomicroscopic appearance in which the rim of the macular hole disappeared or was attached to the underlying RPE with flattening of the cuff of retinal detachment around the hole. On the basis of postoperative OCT findings, the closed macular holes were classified into two groups; type 1 and type 2 closure. Results: Type 1 closure was achieved in 18 (67%) of patients and Type 2 closure in 9 (33%) of patients. Stage 2 hole patients had 100% Type 1 closure whereas Stage 3 hole patients had 50% Type 1 and 50% Type 2 closure. Significant mean difference was found in pre-operative and post-operative BCVA (P-value < 0.01). Significant mean difference in pre-operative BCVA and post-operative BCVA was also observed among patients with stage 2 (P-value < 0.01) and stage 3 (P value < 0.01). Conclusion: Smaller preoperative macular hole size will probably result in the complete sealing of the macular hole without bare RPE after operation. And the complete sealing of the macular hole without bare RPE is associated with better visual acuity, more visual improvement and less recurrence postoperatively.","PeriodicalId":14021,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26638266.2024.v6.i1a.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Macular hole is a full thickness defect of the retina involving anatomical fovea, which is an important cause of central visual loss. Most common cause is idiopathic. The OCT has provided information regarding pathogenesis, classification and surgical success. Purpose: The objective of this study was to find out whether two types of hole closure would show different visual prognosis and to identify the correlation between size of macular hole and the type of closure. Patients and Methods: This study consisted of a retrospective consecutive series of patients who were operated for idiopathic macular hole in R.M. Kedia Eye Hospital from January 2022 to March 2023. Among 35 eyes operated for idiopathic macular hole in the mentioned time frame, 27 eyes of 27 patients with closed macular hole after the initial operation were included in this study. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative OCT examination of the macular lesion, including the measurement of the macular hole diameter. The successful closure of the macular hole was defined as a postoperative biomicroscopic appearance in which the rim of the macular hole disappeared or was attached to the underlying RPE with flattening of the cuff of retinal detachment around the hole. On the basis of postoperative OCT findings, the closed macular holes were classified into two groups; type 1 and type 2 closure. Results: Type 1 closure was achieved in 18 (67%) of patients and Type 2 closure in 9 (33%) of patients. Stage 2 hole patients had 100% Type 1 closure whereas Stage 3 hole patients had 50% Type 1 and 50% Type 2 closure. Significant mean difference was found in pre-operative and post-operative BCVA (P-value < 0.01). Significant mean difference in pre-operative BCVA and post-operative BCVA was also observed among patients with stage 2 (P-value < 0.01) and stage 3 (P value < 0.01). Conclusion: Smaller preoperative macular hole size will probably result in the complete sealing of the macular hole without bare RPE after operation. And the complete sealing of the macular hole without bare RPE is associated with better visual acuity, more visual improvement and less recurrence postoperatively.
尼泊尔一家周边眼科医疗机构的黄斑裂孔手术结果
简介黄斑裂孔是一种涉及解剖学眼窝的全厚度视网膜缺损,是导致中心视力丧失的重要原因。最常见的原因是特发性的。OCT 提供了有关发病机制、分类和手术成功率的信息。目的:本研究旨在了解两种类型的黄斑裂孔闭合术是否会显示出不同的视觉预后,并确定黄斑裂孔大小与闭合类型之间的相关性。患者和方法:本研究是对 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在 R.M. Kedia 眼科医院接受特发性黄斑孔手术的患者进行的回顾性连续系列研究。在上述时间段内接受特发性黄斑孔手术的 35 只眼睛中,有 27 名患者的 27 只眼睛在初次手术后出现闭合性黄斑孔,被纳入本研究。所有患者都接受了黄斑病变的术前和术后 OCT 检查,包括测量黄斑孔直径。黄斑孔成功闭合的定义是术后生物显微镜下黄斑孔边缘消失或与下层 RPE 连接,孔周围视网膜脱落的袖带变平。根据术后 OCT 观察结果,将闭合黄斑孔分为两组:1 型和 2 型闭合。结果:18(67%)名患者实现了 1 型闭合,9(33%)名患者实现了 2 型闭合。2 期患者 100%实现了 1 型闭合,而 3 期患者 50%实现了 1 型闭合,50%实现了 2 型闭合。术前和术后 BCVA 平均值差异显著(P 值<0.01)。第 2 期(P 值 < 0.01)和第 3 期(P 值 < 0.01)患者术前 BCVA 和术后 BCVA 的平均值也有显著差异。结论术前黄斑孔较小的患者术后黄斑孔可能会完全封闭,而不会出现裸露的 RPE。而完全封闭黄斑孔且无裸露 RPE 与更好的视力、更多的视力改善和更少的术后复发有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信