Melodic Differences Between Styles: Modeling Music With Step Inertia

Matt Chiu, David Temperley
{"title":"Melodic Differences Between Styles: Modeling Music With Step Inertia","authors":"Matt Chiu, David Temperley","doi":"10.1177/20592043231225731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A well-known phenomenon in melodic structure is “step inertia”: the tendency for a step to be followed by another step in the same direction. There is strong evidence of step inertia in three corpora of Western common-practice melodies: European folk songs, classical instrumental themes, and English hymn tunes. Surprisingly, modern Western popular music does not reflect step inertia. In Billboard’s Hot 100, and Rolling Stone magazine's list of “greatest songs,” inertial (same-direction) steps are less likely than non-inertial ones. To further explore the role of step inertia in different corpora, we created a generative model that assigns probabilities to melodies, considering just four factors: range, pitch proximity, scale-degree frequency within a key, and step inertia. We optimized the weights of these factors for the Essen Folksong Collection and the Billboard corpus, and compared them with n-gram models. The optimal (normalized) weight of the inertia factor is large and positive for the Essen collection (.51) and small for the Billboard corpus (.02). This is further evidence that step inertia plays a much smaller role in popular melodies than common-practice ones, and that non-inertial steps are slightly favored.","PeriodicalId":436334,"journal":{"name":"Music & Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043231225731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A well-known phenomenon in melodic structure is “step inertia”: the tendency for a step to be followed by another step in the same direction. There is strong evidence of step inertia in three corpora of Western common-practice melodies: European folk songs, classical instrumental themes, and English hymn tunes. Surprisingly, modern Western popular music does not reflect step inertia. In Billboard’s Hot 100, and Rolling Stone magazine's list of “greatest songs,” inertial (same-direction) steps are less likely than non-inertial ones. To further explore the role of step inertia in different corpora, we created a generative model that assigns probabilities to melodies, considering just four factors: range, pitch proximity, scale-degree frequency within a key, and step inertia. We optimized the weights of these factors for the Essen Folksong Collection and the Billboard corpus, and compared them with n-gram models. The optimal (normalized) weight of the inertia factor is large and positive for the Essen collection (.51) and small for the Billboard corpus (.02). This is further evidence that step inertia plays a much smaller role in popular melodies than common-practice ones, and that non-inertial steps are slightly favored.
不同风格之间的旋律差异:用步进惯性模拟音乐
旋律结构中的一个众所周知的现象是 "音步惯性":一个音步之后往往会出现另一个相同方向的音步。在西方常见旋律的三个语料库中,都有很强的音步惯性证据:欧洲民歌、古典器乐主题和英国赞美诗曲调。令人惊讶的是,现代西方流行音乐并没有反映出步进惯性。在《公告牌》的 "百大热门歌曲 "和《滚石》杂志的 "最伟大歌曲 "排行榜中,惯性(同方向)步法比非惯性步法更少出现。为了进一步探究步进惯性在不同语料库中的作用,我们创建了一个生成模型,该模型只考虑四个因素,即音域、音高接近度、调内音阶度频率和步进惯性,为旋律分配概率。我们针对埃森民歌集和 Billboard 语料库优化了这些因素的权重,并与 n-gram 模型进行了比较。埃森民歌集》中惯性因子的最佳(归一化)权重较大且为正值(0.51),而《公告牌》语料库中惯性因子的最佳(归一化)权重较小(0.02)。这进一步证明,在流行旋律中,舞步惯性所起的作用远远小于普通旋律,而非惯性舞步则略受青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信