Solving a Typical Small Sample Size MRSM Dataset Problem Using a Flexible Hybrid Ensemble Approach for Credibility

D. Chikobvu, Domingo Pavolo
{"title":"Solving a Typical Small Sample Size MRSM Dataset Problem Using a Flexible Hybrid Ensemble Approach for Credibility","authors":"D. Chikobvu, Domingo Pavolo","doi":"10.19139/soic-2310-5070-1111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiresponse surface methodology often involves small data analytics which, statistically, have regression modelling credibility problems. This is worsened by dataset, model selection and solution methodology uncertainties. It is difficult for solution methodologies which select and use single best models per response at simultaneous optimisation to effectively deal with these problems. This paper exploited the fact that model selection criteria choose differently, in a flexible hybrid ensemble system, to generate several solutions for integration and comparison. Mean square prediction error, with bias-variance-covariance decomposition values, was computed and analysed at simultaneous optimisation. Results suggest that the credibility of the final solution is enhanced when working with multiple models, solution methodologies and results. However, the results do not show any significance of small sample size correction to model selection criteria and analysis of bias-variance-covariance decompositions at simultaneous optimisation does not encourage dependence on theoretical optimality for best results.","PeriodicalId":131002,"journal":{"name":"Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-1111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiresponse surface methodology often involves small data analytics which, statistically, have regression modelling credibility problems. This is worsened by dataset, model selection and solution methodology uncertainties. It is difficult for solution methodologies which select and use single best models per response at simultaneous optimisation to effectively deal with these problems. This paper exploited the fact that model selection criteria choose differently, in a flexible hybrid ensemble system, to generate several solutions for integration and comparison. Mean square prediction error, with bias-variance-covariance decomposition values, was computed and analysed at simultaneous optimisation. Results suggest that the credibility of the final solution is enhanced when working with multiple models, solution methodologies and results. However, the results do not show any significance of small sample size correction to model selection criteria and analysis of bias-variance-covariance decompositions at simultaneous optimisation does not encourage dependence on theoretical optimality for best results.
使用灵活的混合集合方法解决典型的小样本量 MRSM 数据集问题,提高可信度
多反应表面方法通常涉及小数据分析,从统计学角度看,存在回归模型可信度问题。数据集、模型选择和求解方法的不确定性使问题更加严重。在同步优化过程中,为每个响应选择和使用单一最佳模型的求解方法很难有效应对这些问题。本文利用模型选择标准选择不同的事实,在一个灵活的混合集合系统中,生成多个解决方案进行整合和比较。在同步优化过程中,计算并分析了带有偏差-方差-协方差分解值的均方预测误差。结果表明,在使用多种模型、解决方法和结果时,最终解决方案的可信度会得到提高。然而,结果并未显示小样本量校正对模型选择标准的任何意义,而且在同步优化时对偏差-方差-协方差分解的分析并不鼓励依赖理论最优性来获得最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信