COMPARISON OF PATELLAR MOBILIZATION AND TAPING IN PATIENT WITH PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME

Rabia Khan, Shahnila Anum, Ghousia Shahid, Farhan Ishaque, Muhammad Usman, Sobia Hassan
{"title":"COMPARISON OF PATELLAR MOBILIZATION AND TAPING IN PATIENT WITH PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME","authors":"Rabia Khan, Shahnila Anum, Ghousia Shahid, Farhan Ishaque, Muhammad Usman, Sobia Hassan","doi":"10.36283/pjr.zu.13.1/008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background of the Study: To compare patellar taping and mobilization plus conventional therapy for reducing knee pain in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).\nMethodology: Controlled trial with 50 participants divided into two groups who received different treatments for 6 weeks: Group A had patellar taping and iliotibial band stretching, while Group B had patellar mobilization and quadriceps strengthening. Participants received three treatment sessions weekly for six weeks. The VAS was used to conduct pre and post-test pain evaluations for groups A and B.\nResults: Knee pain decreased in PFPS patients receiving patellar taping (Group A) or mobilization (Group B) using VAS (p<0.05). All treatments are effective for PFPS. The VAS scores after 6 weeks of post A and post B treatments assessed. After 6 weeks of taping, mean = 0.76±0.83. After 6 weeks, mean and SD = 1.20±1.12 from patellar mobilization. No significant difference between means (p = 0.12, α ≤ 0.05). Insignificance.\nConclusion: The result of the study indicated that after 6 weeks of treatment for both patellar taping and patellar mobilization were effective in decreasing pain in PFPS.\nKeywords: Syndrome, mobilization, taping, visual analogue scale, pain, rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":498021,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan journal of rehabilitation","volume":"11 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan journal of rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36283/pjr.zu.13.1/008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background of the Study: To compare patellar taping and mobilization plus conventional therapy for reducing knee pain in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Methodology: Controlled trial with 50 participants divided into two groups who received different treatments for 6 weeks: Group A had patellar taping and iliotibial band stretching, while Group B had patellar mobilization and quadriceps strengthening. Participants received three treatment sessions weekly for six weeks. The VAS was used to conduct pre and post-test pain evaluations for groups A and B. Results: Knee pain decreased in PFPS patients receiving patellar taping (Group A) or mobilization (Group B) using VAS (p<0.05). All treatments are effective for PFPS. The VAS scores after 6 weeks of post A and post B treatments assessed. After 6 weeks of taping, mean = 0.76±0.83. After 6 weeks, mean and SD = 1.20±1.12 from patellar mobilization. No significant difference between means (p = 0.12, α ≤ 0.05). Insignificance. Conclusion: The result of the study indicated that after 6 weeks of treatment for both patellar taping and patellar mobilization were effective in decreasing pain in PFPS. Keywords: Syndrome, mobilization, taping, visual analogue scale, pain, rehabilitation.
对髌股关节疼痛综合征患者进行髌骨活动和绑带治疗的比较
研究背景:比较髌骨绑带疗法和活动疗法加传统疗法在减轻髌股关节疼痛综合征(PFPS)患者膝关节疼痛方面的效果:对照试验:50 名参与者分为两组,分别接受为期 6 周的不同治疗:A组接受髌骨绑带和髂胫束拉伸治疗,B组接受髌骨活动和股四头肌强化治疗。参与者每周接受三次治疗,为期六周。采用 VAS 对 A 组和 B 组进行测试前和测试后疼痛评估:结果:接受髌骨绑扎(A 组)或运动疗法(B 组)的 PFPS 患者的膝关节疼痛均有所减轻(VAS)(P<0.05)。所有治疗方法对 PFPS 均有效。对 A 组和 B 组治疗 6 周后的 VAS 评分进行了评估。绑带 6 周后,平均值 = 0.76±0.83。6 周后,髌骨活动的平均值和 SD = 1.20±1.12。平均值之间无明显差异(P = 0.12,α ≤ 0.05)。结论研究结果表明,经过 6 周的治疗后,髌骨绑带和髌骨活动均能有效减轻 PFPS 患者的疼痛:综合征、活动、绑带、视觉模拟量表、疼痛、康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信