Chukotka as a Portal for the Rabies Introduction into Kamchatka (Systematic Review)

A. D. Botvinkin, I. D. Zarva, S. A. Chupin, A. V. Mel’nikov, I. V. Mel’tsov
{"title":"Chukotka as a Portal for the Rabies Introduction into Kamchatka (Systematic Review)","authors":"A. D. Botvinkin, I. D. Zarva, S. A. Chupin, A. V. Mel’nikov, I. V. Mel’tsov","doi":"10.21055/0370-1069-2023-4-6-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this review was to assess the peculiarities of distribution and epidemiological risk of rabies in the extreme northeast of Asia. The systematic review was prepared through synthesizing publications on rabies over 1860–2022 (n=22) and previously unpublished data for 2009–2023. From the late 19th century until the 1980s, rabies epizootics were consistently observed in Chukotka and Kamchatka. A correlation was found between the time of occurrence of rabies in those territories with a lag period of 1–2 years (r=0.349; p=0.054). In 2009–2023, 24 animal rabies cases were confirmed in Chukotka; rabies has not been registered in Kamchatka since 1981. Until 1982, 5 confirmed human rabies cases were described in Chukotka, as well as 4 lethal cases presumably due to rabies (Chukotka – 3, Kamchatka – 1). The similarity of the spatial distribution of epizootics in different periods of time was established. Rabies was detected mainly in the area of the permanent polar fox (Vulpes lagopus) habitation, in the coastal tundra from the mouth of the Kolyma River to the Anadyr Gulf. Outside this territory (the valleys of the Anadyr and Penzhina Rivers, the Kamchatka Peninsula), rabies was reported in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). At present, the importance of the polar fox in the spread of rabies in Chukotka has decreased, while the significance of the red fox has increased substantially. Due to vaccination, rabies among dogs is recorded sporadically. Rabies virus isolates from Chukotka belong to the Arctic genetic lineage (Arctic-3 group), which has a circumpolar distribution. The possibility of independent circulation of the rabies virus in the Kamchatka Peninsula is doubtful because of the limited size of the red fox population. Based on the mapping, possible directions for the introduction of rabies to Kamchatka from Chukotka have been identified. Barrier oral rabies vaccination of foxes is recommended during the years of high abundance of red and polar foxes in Chukotka.","PeriodicalId":516710,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2023-4-6-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this review was to assess the peculiarities of distribution and epidemiological risk of rabies in the extreme northeast of Asia. The systematic review was prepared through synthesizing publications on rabies over 1860–2022 (n=22) and previously unpublished data for 2009–2023. From the late 19th century until the 1980s, rabies epizootics were consistently observed in Chukotka and Kamchatka. A correlation was found between the time of occurrence of rabies in those territories with a lag period of 1–2 years (r=0.349; p=0.054). In 2009–2023, 24 animal rabies cases were confirmed in Chukotka; rabies has not been registered in Kamchatka since 1981. Until 1982, 5 confirmed human rabies cases were described in Chukotka, as well as 4 lethal cases presumably due to rabies (Chukotka – 3, Kamchatka – 1). The similarity of the spatial distribution of epizootics in different periods of time was established. Rabies was detected mainly in the area of the permanent polar fox (Vulpes lagopus) habitation, in the coastal tundra from the mouth of the Kolyma River to the Anadyr Gulf. Outside this territory (the valleys of the Anadyr and Penzhina Rivers, the Kamchatka Peninsula), rabies was reported in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). At present, the importance of the polar fox in the spread of rabies in Chukotka has decreased, while the significance of the red fox has increased substantially. Due to vaccination, rabies among dogs is recorded sporadically. Rabies virus isolates from Chukotka belong to the Arctic genetic lineage (Arctic-3 group), which has a circumpolar distribution. The possibility of independent circulation of the rabies virus in the Kamchatka Peninsula is doubtful because of the limited size of the red fox population. Based on the mapping, possible directions for the introduction of rabies to Kamchatka from Chukotka have been identified. Barrier oral rabies vaccination of foxes is recommended during the years of high abundance of red and polar foxes in Chukotka.
楚科奇是将狂犬病引入堪察加半岛的门户(系统回顾)
本综述旨在评估狂犬病在亚洲东北部的分布特点和流行风险。本系统综述综合了 1860 年至 2022 年有关狂犬病的出版物(n=22)和 2009 年至 2023 年以前未发表的数据。从 19 世纪末到 20 世纪 80 年代,在楚科奇和堪察加半岛持续观察到狂犬病流行。研究发现,这些地区发生狂犬病的时间与 1-2 年的滞后期之间存在相关性(r=0.349;p=0.054)。2009-2023 年间,楚科奇有 24 例动物狂犬病确诊病例;堪察加自 1981 年以来没有登记过狂犬病病例。直到 1982 年,楚科奇有 5 例人类狂犬病确诊病例,以及 4 例推测为狂犬病所致的死亡病例(楚科奇 3 例,堪察加 1 例)。不同时期狂犬病流行的空间分布具有相似性。狂犬病主要发生在北极狐(Vulpes lagopus)的长期栖息地,即从科雷马河口到阿纳德尔湾的沿海冻土带。在这一地区之外(阿纳季尔河和奔日娜河流域、堪察加半岛),据报告在赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)中也发现了狂犬病。目前,北极狐在楚科奇狂犬病传播中的重要性有所下降,而赤狐的重要性则大幅上升。由于进行了疫苗接种,狗中的狂犬病记录时有发生。从楚科奇分离到的狂犬病病毒属于北极基因系(北极-3 组),该基因系呈环极分布。由于红狐数量有限,堪察加半岛狂犬病病毒独立循环的可能性值得怀疑。根据测绘结果,确定了狂犬病从楚科奇传入堪察加半岛的可能方向。建议在楚科奇赤狐和北极狐数量较多的年份对狐狸进行阻隔性口服狂犬病疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信