Doctor's Liability to Patient Due to Default in Therapeutic Agreement (Case Study of Ma RI Decision Number 2811 K/Pdt/2012)

Galih Fatoni, B. R. Nurhayati, Hari Puja Nugroho
{"title":"Doctor's Liability to Patient Due to Default in Therapeutic Agreement (Case Study of Ma RI Decision Number 2811 K/Pdt/2012)","authors":"Galih Fatoni, B. R. Nurhayati, Hari Puja Nugroho","doi":"10.58258/jisip.v8i1.6027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legal relationship that occurs between a doctor and a patient is called a Therapeutic Agreement/Transaction. Risks that can cause harm to patients can occur in even the smallest medical procedures. A doctor can be held liable if he has made a mistake or negligence and caused harm, although basically no doctor intentionally makes a mistake as happened in the Indonesian Supreme Court Decision Number 2811K/Pdt/2012. The type of research used by the author is normative juridical, namely legal research carried out by examining library materials or often also referred to as library legal research. The results of the research carried out were obtained by the judge's consideration in the Indonesian Supreme Court Decision Number 2811K/Pdt/2012 which was inaccurate, because according to the Supreme Court judge, the cassation respondent's actions were correct and did not violate any legal provisions. In fact, after a description of the facts in the series of events in this case, it was clearly found that the doctor and hospital had done things that violated the provisions of the Health Law, including violating the Medical Code of Ethics. The actions of the cassation respondent, especially doctor E and including doctor J as the recipient of the delegation, have been proven to be in breach of contract. This is because the actions of the two doctors violated the provisions of the Medical Practice Law, namely that the actions they took were not in accordance with standard procedures and violated the provisions of the law.","PeriodicalId":364743,"journal":{"name":"JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan)","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v8i1.6027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The legal relationship that occurs between a doctor and a patient is called a Therapeutic Agreement/Transaction. Risks that can cause harm to patients can occur in even the smallest medical procedures. A doctor can be held liable if he has made a mistake or negligence and caused harm, although basically no doctor intentionally makes a mistake as happened in the Indonesian Supreme Court Decision Number 2811K/Pdt/2012. The type of research used by the author is normative juridical, namely legal research carried out by examining library materials or often also referred to as library legal research. The results of the research carried out were obtained by the judge's consideration in the Indonesian Supreme Court Decision Number 2811K/Pdt/2012 which was inaccurate, because according to the Supreme Court judge, the cassation respondent's actions were correct and did not violate any legal provisions. In fact, after a description of the facts in the series of events in this case, it was clearly found that the doctor and hospital had done things that violated the provisions of the Health Law, including violating the Medical Code of Ethics. The actions of the cassation respondent, especially doctor E and including doctor J as the recipient of the delegation, have been proven to be in breach of contract. This is because the actions of the two doctors violated the provisions of the Medical Practice Law, namely that the actions they took were not in accordance with standard procedures and violated the provisions of the law.
医生因违反治疗协议而对病人承担的责任(马RI第2811 K/Pdt/2012号判决的案例研究)
医生与患者之间的法律关系被称为治疗协议/交易。即使是最微小的医疗程序,也可能存在对患者造成伤害的风险。如果医生犯了错误或玩忽职守并造成了伤害,他可能会被追究责任,尽管基本上没有医生故意犯错,如印尼最高法院第 2811K/Pdt/2012 号判决中发生的情况。作者使用的研究类型是规范法学,即通过查阅图书馆资料进行的法律研究,通常也称为图书馆法律研究。所进行研究的结果是通过法官对印度尼西亚最高法院第 2811K/Pdt/2012 号判决的审议获得的,而该判决是不准确的,因为根据最高法院法官的说法,撤销原判被告的行为是正确的,没有违反任何法律规定。事实上,在对本案一系列事件的事实进行描述后,可以清楚地发现医生和医院的行为违反了《卫生法》的规定,包括违反了《医疗道德规范》。撤销原判答辩人的行为,特别是医生 E,包括医生 J 作为接受委托人的行为,已被证明是违约行为。这是因为这两名医生的行为违反了《医疗行为法》的规定,即他们的行为不符合标准程序,违反了法律规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信