A Study on Student’s Learning Achievement with Traditional Assessment and Portfolio Assessment.

Sarifuddin Muhamad
{"title":"A Study on Student’s Learning Achievement with Traditional Assessment and Portfolio Assessment.","authors":"Sarifuddin Muhamad","doi":"10.36312/jcm.v5i1.2587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstack:The purposes of this research are to describe the student’s learning achievement with traditional assessment and portfolio assessment, and then find out the difference between the student’s learning achievement with traditional assessment and portfolio assessment. The design of this research is ex post facto. The population is the 1st class of students of MTs Muamalah Jurang Jaler.  In selecting the sample is used clustered random sampling. The students of class 1A and 1B of MTs Putri Al- Islahuddiny Kediri are chosen as the sample. The data collection is done by observation and collecting the documentation. T-test is used to analysis the difference between the students’ learning achievement with traditional assessment and portfolio assessment. Based on the analysis, the researcher finds that mean of the class with traditional assessment is 60.00 and mean of the class with portfolio assessment is 70.31. By using t-test at the level of significance (a) 0.05, is got tratio is bigger than ttable, that is tratio = 2.833  > ttable = 1.992, it shows that there is a significant difference between the students’ learning achievement with traditional assessment and portfolio assessment. \nIt can be concluded that the student learning achievement with portfolio assessment is better than the student learning achievement with traditional assessment at the level of believe 95%. But portfolio assessment is better implemented in small class because teacher will be easier in managing the class. \n  \nKey term: Traditional Assessment and Portfolio Assessment.","PeriodicalId":347651,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online)","volume":"16 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36312/jcm.v5i1.2587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstack:The purposes of this research are to describe the student’s learning achievement with traditional assessment and portfolio assessment, and then find out the difference between the student’s learning achievement with traditional assessment and portfolio assessment. The design of this research is ex post facto. The population is the 1st class of students of MTs Muamalah Jurang Jaler.  In selecting the sample is used clustered random sampling. The students of class 1A and 1B of MTs Putri Al- Islahuddiny Kediri are chosen as the sample. The data collection is done by observation and collecting the documentation. T-test is used to analysis the difference between the students’ learning achievement with traditional assessment and portfolio assessment. Based on the analysis, the researcher finds that mean of the class with traditional assessment is 60.00 and mean of the class with portfolio assessment is 70.31. By using t-test at the level of significance (a) 0.05, is got tratio is bigger than ttable, that is tratio = 2.833  > ttable = 1.992, it shows that there is a significant difference between the students’ learning achievement with traditional assessment and portfolio assessment. It can be concluded that the student learning achievement with portfolio assessment is better than the student learning achievement with traditional assessment at the level of believe 95%. But portfolio assessment is better implemented in small class because teacher will be easier in managing the class.   Key term: Traditional Assessment and Portfolio Assessment.
传统评估和组合评估对学生学习成绩的影响研究。
摘要:本研究的目的是描述学生在传统评价和作品集评价下的学习成绩,然后找出学生在传统评价和作品集评价下的学习成绩之间的差异。本研究的设计是事后研究。研究对象是MTs Muamalah Jurang Jaler的一年级学生。 在选择样本时,采用了聚类随机抽样法。样本选自 Putri Al- Islahuddiny Kediri MTs 1A 和 1B 班的学生。数据收集通过观察和收集文件来完成。采用T检验分析学生在传统评价和作品集评价中学习成绩的差异。根据分析,研究人员发现采用传统评价的班级的平均成绩为 60.00,而采用作品集评价的班级的平均成绩为 70.31。在显著性水平(a)为 0.05 的条件下进行 t 检验,得到 tratio 大于 ttable,即 tratio = 2.833 > ttable = 1.992,这表明学生的学习成绩在传统评价和组合评价之间存在显著差异。由此可以得出结论,在 95% 的信度水平上,采用作品集评价的学生学习成绩优于采用传统评价的学生学习成绩。但组合评价在小班实施效果更好,因为教师更容易管理班级。 关键术语传统评价和组合评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信