Lecturers Perception Of Plagiarism Among Undergraduates In Nigeria

Iyanu Omotunde Oluwatobi, Abigail Ajie Ifeoma, Mayowa-Adebara Okeoghene, Loveth Ogoegbulam
{"title":"Lecturers Perception Of Plagiarism Among Undergraduates In Nigeria","authors":"Iyanu Omotunde Oluwatobi, Abigail Ajie Ifeoma, Mayowa-Adebara Okeoghene, Loveth Ogoegbulam","doi":"10.59568/jasic-2023-4-2-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of the internet and the ensuing free access to increasingly available information resources and possibilities for students’ ‘copying and pasting’ text from online documents has raised so much concern. There is therefore a growing need for lecturers to address the underlying causes. Thus, this study examines faculty perception of plagiarism among Undergraduates. The study adopted a survey research design. A simple and total enumeration sampling techniques was adopted to cover all the entire lecturers in the faculty of education, Federal University Oye-Ekiti (FUOYE). The instrument use for data collection was the questionnaire titled “Faculty Perception of Plagiarism among Undergraduates’’ (FPPU). Reliability and validity test was conducted on the instrument. A total of 63 copies of questionnaire (97%) were returned and found usable. Data collected were analyzed with the use of descriptive analysis. The findings shows that the reasons for plagiarism among undergraduates includes students laziness (mean=3.44), easy access to materials via the internet (mean=3.27) and not understanding the rules of referencing (mean= 3.27). However, lecturers perception of plagiarism among undergraduates indicates that undergraduates copying of few paragraph of an essay from books without citation (mean= 3.48). Furthermore, lecturers put up some strategies in detecting plagiarize work which includes; using the library shelves to provide evidence (mean =1.84), using specialized plagiarism detecting tools (mean= 1.40), and using online searching tools to provide evidence (mean= 1.38). Consequences for plagiarism among undergraduates include; scoring the students 0% on the assignment (mean= 1.56) and cannot attend classes for a specific amount of time (mean = 1.81). The study therefore, concluded that lecturers understand the offence of plagiarism and therefore have some punitive measures towards the act of plagiarism. It was further recommended that undergraduates should be enlightened adequately on research methodology courses to be taught at various levels of study and handled by experienced lecturers.","PeriodicalId":167914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Science, Information and Computing","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Science, Information and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59568/jasic-2023-4-2-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of the internet and the ensuing free access to increasingly available information resources and possibilities for students’ ‘copying and pasting’ text from online documents has raised so much concern. There is therefore a growing need for lecturers to address the underlying causes. Thus, this study examines faculty perception of plagiarism among Undergraduates. The study adopted a survey research design. A simple and total enumeration sampling techniques was adopted to cover all the entire lecturers in the faculty of education, Federal University Oye-Ekiti (FUOYE). The instrument use for data collection was the questionnaire titled “Faculty Perception of Plagiarism among Undergraduates’’ (FPPU). Reliability and validity test was conducted on the instrument. A total of 63 copies of questionnaire (97%) were returned and found usable. Data collected were analyzed with the use of descriptive analysis. The findings shows that the reasons for plagiarism among undergraduates includes students laziness (mean=3.44), easy access to materials via the internet (mean=3.27) and not understanding the rules of referencing (mean= 3.27). However, lecturers perception of plagiarism among undergraduates indicates that undergraduates copying of few paragraph of an essay from books without citation (mean= 3.48). Furthermore, lecturers put up some strategies in detecting plagiarize work which includes; using the library shelves to provide evidence (mean =1.84), using specialized plagiarism detecting tools (mean= 1.40), and using online searching tools to provide evidence (mean= 1.38). Consequences for plagiarism among undergraduates include; scoring the students 0% on the assignment (mean= 1.56) and cannot attend classes for a specific amount of time (mean = 1.81). The study therefore, concluded that lecturers understand the offence of plagiarism and therefore have some punitive measures towards the act of plagiarism. It was further recommended that undergraduates should be enlightened adequately on research methodology courses to be taught at various levels of study and handled by experienced lecturers.
讲师对尼日利亚大学生抄袭行为的看法
互联网的出现以及随之而来的自由获取越来越多的信息资源和学生从网上文件中 "复制和粘贴 "文本的可能性引起了人们的广泛关注。因此,讲师们越来越有必要从根本上解决问题。因此,本研究探讨了教师对本科生抄袭行为的看法。本研究采用了调查研究设计。研究采用了简单和全面计数抽样技术,以涵盖奥耶-埃基蒂联邦大学(FUOYE)教育学院的所有讲师。数据收集工具是题为 "教师对本科生剽窃行为的看法"(FPPU)的调查问卷。对问卷进行了信度和效度测试。共收回 63 份问卷(97%),并认为问卷可用。对收集到的数据进行了描述性分析。调查结果显示,大学生抄袭的原因包括学生懒惰(平均值=3.44)、容易通过互联网获取资料(平均值=3.27)和不了解参考文献的规则(平均值=3.27)。然而,讲师们对本科生抄袭行为的看法表明,本科生抄袭书本上的几段文章而不注明出处(平均值=3.48)。此外,讲师们还提出了一些检测抄袭作品的策略,包括:利用图书馆书架提供证据(平均值=1.84),使用专门的抄袭检测工具(平均值=1.40),以及使用在线搜索工具提供证据(平均值=1.38)。本科生抄袭的后果包括:学生的作业得分为 0%(平均值=1.56),以及在特定时间内不能上课(平均值=1.81)。因此,研究得出结论认为,讲师们了解抄袭的违法行为,因此对抄袭行为采取了一些惩罚措施。研究还建议,应适当向本科生传授研究方法论课程,由经验丰富的讲师在不同年级讲授这些课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信