Evaluation of the Rational Drug Use (RDU) literacy among undergraduate students

Teeraporn Sadira Supapaan, Bee Yean Low, Claire Anderson, Tuanthon Boonlue, Napaphorn Puripunyavanich, Jeerisuda Khumsikiew, Chonladda Pitchayajittipong, Prasittichai Poonphol
{"title":"Evaluation of the Rational Drug Use (RDU) literacy among undergraduate students","authors":"Teeraporn Sadira Supapaan, Bee Yean Low, Claire Anderson, Tuanthon Boonlue, Napaphorn Puripunyavanich, Jeerisuda Khumsikiew, Chonladda Pitchayajittipong, Prasittichai Poonphol","doi":"10.18549/pharmpract.2023.4.2867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Irrational drug usage is a global concern. WHO recommended a strategy for integrating education and awareness on the rational use of medicine into general education programs. Objective: To evaluate the rational drug use (RDU) literacy among the undergraduate students of Ubon Ratchathani University. Methods: This mixed-methods research consists of a quantitative cross-sectional study with a self-administered RDU literacy questionnaire and a qualitative in-depth interview study. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used in the quantitative study. Thematic analysis was used in the qualitative study. Results: Students who participated in this study included 640 undergraduate students. Approximately half of the participants never studied a RDU-related course (50.94%). Although the findings revealed that most of the participants (73.13%) had good RDU literacy, many participants had less frequency of the right options on some questions (e.g., advertisement of health products). Health sciences students were 2.8 times more likely than non-health sciences students to have good RDU literacy (AOR=2.835, 95% CI: 1.752-4.587). Four main themes were derived from the qualitative study: 1. Definition of RDU; 2. Facilitators; 3. Concerns; 4. RDU country. Conclusion: While the majority of participants demonstrated good RDU literacy, some actually engaged in irrational drug use. Activities promoting RDU literacy among undergraduate students, particularly in faculties other than health sciences, are still required.","PeriodicalId":516653,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Practice","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2023.4.2867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Irrational drug usage is a global concern. WHO recommended a strategy for integrating education and awareness on the rational use of medicine into general education programs. Objective: To evaluate the rational drug use (RDU) literacy among the undergraduate students of Ubon Ratchathani University. Methods: This mixed-methods research consists of a quantitative cross-sectional study with a self-administered RDU literacy questionnaire and a qualitative in-depth interview study. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used in the quantitative study. Thematic analysis was used in the qualitative study. Results: Students who participated in this study included 640 undergraduate students. Approximately half of the participants never studied a RDU-related course (50.94%). Although the findings revealed that most of the participants (73.13%) had good RDU literacy, many participants had less frequency of the right options on some questions (e.g., advertisement of health products). Health sciences students were 2.8 times more likely than non-health sciences students to have good RDU literacy (AOR=2.835, 95% CI: 1.752-4.587). Four main themes were derived from the qualitative study: 1. Definition of RDU; 2. Facilitators; 3. Concerns; 4. RDU country. Conclusion: While the majority of participants demonstrated good RDU literacy, some actually engaged in irrational drug use. Activities promoting RDU literacy among undergraduate students, particularly in faculties other than health sciences, are still required.
对大学生合理用药(RDU)素养的评估
背景:不合理用药是一个全球关注的问题。世卫组织建议制定一项战略,将合理用药的教育和宣传纳入普通教育计划。目的:评估泰国罗勇府大学本科生的合理用药(RDU)素养:评估乌汶叻他尼大学本科生的合理用药(RDU)素养。研究方法这项混合方法研究包括一项自填合理用药素养问卷的横断面定量研究和一项深入访谈的定性研究。定量研究使用了描述性统计和推断性统计。定性研究采用了主题分析法。研究结果参与本研究的学生包括 640 名本科生。大约一半的参与者从未学习过与 RDU 相关的课程(50.94%)。尽管研究结果显示大多数参与者(73.13%)具有良好的 RDU 素养,但许多参与者在某些问题上(如保健品广告)的正确选项出现频率较低。与非健康科学专业学生相比,健康科学专业学生具有良好 RDU 扫盲能力的可能性是后者的 2.8 倍(AOR=2.835,95% CI:1.752-4.587)。定性研究得出了四大主题:1.RDU的定义;2.促进因素;3.关注点;4.RDU国家。结论:虽然大多数参与者表现出良好的 RDU 素养,但有些人实际上参与了非理性吸毒。仍需在本科生中开展促进 RDU 扫盲的活动,特别是在健康科学以外的院系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信