Are James Webb Space Telescope Observations Consistent with Warm Dark Matter?

B. Hoeneisen
{"title":"Are James Webb Space Telescope Observations Consistent with Warm Dark Matter?","authors":"B. Hoeneisen","doi":"10.4236/ijaa.2024.141003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compare observed with predicted distributions of galaxy stellar masses $M_*$ and galaxy rest-frame ultra-violet luminosities per unit bandwidth $L_{UV}$, in the redshift range $z = 2$ to 13. The comparison is presented as a function of the comoving warm dark matter free-streaming cut-off wavenumber $k_{fs}$. For this comparison the theory is a minimal extension of the Press-Schechter formalism with only two parameters: the star formation efficiency, and a proportionality factor between the star formation rate per galaxy and $L_{UV}$. These two parameters are fixed to their values obtained prior to the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) data. The purpose of this comparison is to identify if, and where, detailed astrophysical evolution is needed to account for the new JWST observations.","PeriodicalId":434427,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics","volume":"27 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2024.141003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compare observed with predicted distributions of galaxy stellar masses $M_*$ and galaxy rest-frame ultra-violet luminosities per unit bandwidth $L_{UV}$, in the redshift range $z = 2$ to 13. The comparison is presented as a function of the comoving warm dark matter free-streaming cut-off wavenumber $k_{fs}$. For this comparison the theory is a minimal extension of the Press-Schechter formalism with only two parameters: the star formation efficiency, and a proportionality factor between the star formation rate per galaxy and $L_{UV}$. These two parameters are fixed to their values obtained prior to the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) data. The purpose of this comparison is to identify if, and where, detailed astrophysical evolution is needed to account for the new JWST observations.
詹姆斯-韦伯太空望远镜的观测结果与暖暗物质一致吗?
我们比较了在红移$z = 2$到13$范围内观测到的星系恒星质量$M_*$和星系静帧紫外线光度单位带宽$L_{UV}$的分布情况。比较结果是以移动的暖暗物质自由流截止波数 $k_{fs}$ 的函数形式呈现的。在这种比较中,理论是普雷斯-舍赫特形式主义的最小扩展,只有两个参数:恒星形成效率,以及每个星系的恒星形成率与$L_{UV}$之间的比例因子。这两个参数被固定为詹姆斯-韦伯太空望远镜(JWST)数据之前获得的值。这一比较的目的是为了确定是否以及在哪些方面需要详细的天体物理演变来解释新的 JWST 观测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信