Comparing Traditional and LLM-based Search for Image Geolocation

Albatool Wazzan, Stephen MacNeil, Richard Souvenir
{"title":"Comparing Traditional and LLM-based Search for Image Geolocation","authors":"Albatool Wazzan, Stephen MacNeil, Richard Souvenir","doi":"10.1145/3627508.3638305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web search engines have long served as indispensable tools for information retrieval; user behavior and query formulation strategies have been well studied. The introduction of search engines powered by large language models (LLMs) suggested more conversational search and new types of query strategies. In this paper, we compare traditional and LLM-based search for the task of image geolocation, i.e., determining the location where an image was captured. Our work examines user interactions, with a particular focus on query formulation strategies. In our study, 60 participants were assigned either traditional or LLM-based search engines as assistants for geolocation. Participants using traditional search more accurately predicted the location of the image compared to those using the LLM-based search. Distinct strategies emerged between users depending on the type of assistant. Participants using the LLM-based search issued longer, more natural language queries, but had shorter search sessions. When reformulating their search queries, traditional search participants tended to add more terms to their initial queries, whereas participants using the LLM-based search consistently rephrased their initial queries.","PeriodicalId":220434,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","volume":"1 3","pages":"291-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3627508.3638305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Web search engines have long served as indispensable tools for information retrieval; user behavior and query formulation strategies have been well studied. The introduction of search engines powered by large language models (LLMs) suggested more conversational search and new types of query strategies. In this paper, we compare traditional and LLM-based search for the task of image geolocation, i.e., determining the location where an image was captured. Our work examines user interactions, with a particular focus on query formulation strategies. In our study, 60 participants were assigned either traditional or LLM-based search engines as assistants for geolocation. Participants using traditional search more accurately predicted the location of the image compared to those using the LLM-based search. Distinct strategies emerged between users depending on the type of assistant. Participants using the LLM-based search issued longer, more natural language queries, but had shorter search sessions. When reformulating their search queries, traditional search participants tended to add more terms to their initial queries, whereas participants using the LLM-based search consistently rephrased their initial queries.
比较传统搜索和基于 LLM 的图像地理定位搜索
长期以来,网络搜索引擎一直是信息检索不可或缺的工具;人们对用户行为和查询策略进行了深入研究。由大型语言模型(LLM)驱动的搜索引擎的引入,提出了更多对话式搜索和新型查询策略。在本文中,我们比较了传统搜索和基于 LLM 的搜索在图像地理定位任务(即确定图像拍摄地点)中的应用。我们的工作研究了用户交互,尤其侧重于查询制定策略。在我们的研究中,60 名参与者被指定使用传统搜索引擎或基于 LLM 的搜索引擎作为地理定位的助手。与使用基于 LLM 的搜索相比,使用传统搜索的参与者能更准确地预测图像的位置。根据助手类型的不同,用户之间出现了不同的策略。使用基于 LLM 的搜索的用户发出的查询时间更长、语言更自然,但搜索时间更短。在重新制定搜索查询时,传统搜索的参与者倾向于在初始查询中添加更多术语,而使用基于 LLM 的搜索的参与者则一直在重新措辞他们的初始查询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信