Prevention of Induced Abortion - Effect on Pain. Systematic Review of a Database

Svetlana Radeva
{"title":"Prevention of Induced Abortion - Effect on Pain. Systematic Review of a Database","authors":"Svetlana Radeva","doi":"10.47191/ijmra/v7-i01-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Review of the current literature on pain prevention in induced abortion.An in - depth analysis of the guidelines of leading international and national organizations for prophylaxis of induced abortion-surgical and medicated abortion during the I-st and II-nd trimester in terms of pain response has been carried out. Shared with the author's many years of practical experience in order to assess the risks and benefits of the application of modern means of prophylaxis in artificial abortion and thus to improve the individual obstetric-gynecological practice. Methods: review of available literature from the last 10 years. Results and discussion:Paracetamol, oral lorazepam and nitric oxide do not improve pain control. Currently, the use of sedation is not recommended for Surgical abortion. Inhalation anaesthesia should not be used for sedation. Intravenous sedation with fentanyl and midazolam is recommended and safe - below 1.0% complications. In Medical abortion, 75.0% of women experience pain severe enough to require analgesia. The pain begins 2.5 to 4 hours after the use of perplex and lasts about an hour. During the extravehicular trimester, taking a higher number of doses intravenously is associated with more severe and frequent pain. In medicated abortion < 14 gw. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are recommended 30-45 minutes before the procedure. Non-steroidal medicines do not reduce the efficacy of urgencies. Routine administration of paracervical block before 13 gw. when using modern means for medicated abortion is unnecessary. Narcotic analgesics (Tramadol) do not affect pain in early Medical abortion and their routine use is not recommended. Conclusion:In Surgical abortion, analgesia is always offered. Most commonly, analgesics, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs local anesthesia (paracervical block with Lidocaine 20.1%; or 10.2%),) and/ or sedation, supplemented with verbal sedation, are sufficient to relieve pain before mechanical cervical dilation and during uterine evacuation. The technique of deep paracervical injection of Lidocacaine at two points is recommended.","PeriodicalId":506697,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS","volume":"150 1-4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i01-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Review of the current literature on pain prevention in induced abortion.An in - depth analysis of the guidelines of leading international and national organizations for prophylaxis of induced abortion-surgical and medicated abortion during the I-st and II-nd trimester in terms of pain response has been carried out. Shared with the author's many years of practical experience in order to assess the risks and benefits of the application of modern means of prophylaxis in artificial abortion and thus to improve the individual obstetric-gynecological practice. Methods: review of available literature from the last 10 years. Results and discussion:Paracetamol, oral lorazepam and nitric oxide do not improve pain control. Currently, the use of sedation is not recommended for Surgical abortion. Inhalation anaesthesia should not be used for sedation. Intravenous sedation with fentanyl and midazolam is recommended and safe - below 1.0% complications. In Medical abortion, 75.0% of women experience pain severe enough to require analgesia. The pain begins 2.5 to 4 hours after the use of perplex and lasts about an hour. During the extravehicular trimester, taking a higher number of doses intravenously is associated with more severe and frequent pain. In medicated abortion < 14 gw. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are recommended 30-45 minutes before the procedure. Non-steroidal medicines do not reduce the efficacy of urgencies. Routine administration of paracervical block before 13 gw. when using modern means for medicated abortion is unnecessary. Narcotic analgesics (Tramadol) do not affect pain in early Medical abortion and their routine use is not recommended. Conclusion:In Surgical abortion, analgesia is always offered. Most commonly, analgesics, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs local anesthesia (paracervical block with Lidocaine 20.1%; or 10.2%),) and/ or sedation, supplemented with verbal sedation, are sufficient to relieve pain before mechanical cervical dilation and during uterine evacuation. The technique of deep paracervical injection of Lidocacaine at two points is recommended.
预防人工流产--对疼痛的影响。数据库系统回顾
对当前有关人工流产中疼痛预防的文献进行了回顾。从疼痛反应的角度,深入分析了国际和国内主要组织关于人工流产--第一和第二孕期手术流产和药物流产预防的指导方针。与作者多年的实践经验共享,以评估人工流产中应用现代预防手段的风险和益处,从而改进个人的妇产科实践。方法:回顾过去 10 年的现有文献。结果与讨论:扑热息痛、口服劳拉西泮和一氧化氮不能改善疼痛控制。目前,不建议手术流产使用镇静剂。不应将吸入麻醉用于镇静。建议使用芬太尼和咪达唑仑进行静脉镇静,这种方法安全且并发症发生率低于 1.0%。在药物流产中,75.0% 的女性会感到剧烈疼痛,需要镇痛。疼痛在使用镇痛剂后 2.5 至 4 小时开始,持续约 1 小时。在妊娠外三个月,静脉注射的剂量越大,疼痛越剧烈、越频繁。如果药物流产的胎儿小于 14 个月,建议在手术前 30-45 分钟服用非甾体类消炎药。非类固醇药物不会降低紧迫性的疗效。在使用现代手段进行药物流产时,没有必要在孕 13 周前常规使用宫颈旁阻滞剂。麻醉性镇痛药(曲马多)不会影响早期药物流产的疼痛,因此不建议常规使用。结论:在手术流产中,一定要进行镇痛。大多数情况下,镇痛药,如非甾体类消炎药局部麻醉(宫颈旁阻滞,利多卡因20.1%;或10.2%),)和/或镇静,辅以口头镇静,足以缓解机械性宫颈扩张前和子宫排空时的疼痛。建议采用宫颈旁两点深部注射利多卡因的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信