Development of the Doctrine of Civil Procedural Capacity and Legal Capacity (in Memory of Professor Maria S. Shakaryan)

D. Y. Ionova
{"title":"Development of the Doctrine of Civil Procedural Capacity and Legal Capacity (in Memory of Professor Maria S. Shakaryan)","authors":"D. Y. Ionova","doi":"10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.036-045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is dedicated to the memory of Honored Lawyer of the RSFSR, Doctor of Law, Professor Maria S. Shakaryan. The paper highlights some historical aspects of the development of the doctrine of civil procedural legal capacity and legal capacity, highlights the contribution that Professor Maria S. Shakaryan made to the study of these categories. It is noted that many of the issues that Professor Shakaryan raised in her works remain controversial in the science of civil procedural law to this day. Special attention is paid to dissemination of the concepts of procedural capacity and legal capacity to all participants in procedural relations, as well as to the court. The author argues that this approach destroys the integrity of the concept of not only procedural capacity, but also procedural legal capacity. Separately, the author examines the issue of the need to involve citizens recognized by the court as legally incompetent to participate in person in court proceedings. Attention is drawn to the problem of ensuring adequate protection of the rights of citizens recognized by the court as legally incompetent, which is relevant in practice and unresolved in civil procedural legislation.","PeriodicalId":158497,"journal":{"name":"Actual Problems of Russian Law","volume":"287 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual Problems of Russian Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.036-045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper is dedicated to the memory of Honored Lawyer of the RSFSR, Doctor of Law, Professor Maria S. Shakaryan. The paper highlights some historical aspects of the development of the doctrine of civil procedural legal capacity and legal capacity, highlights the contribution that Professor Maria S. Shakaryan made to the study of these categories. It is noted that many of the issues that Professor Shakaryan raised in her works remain controversial in the science of civil procedural law to this day. Special attention is paid to dissemination of the concepts of procedural capacity and legal capacity to all participants in procedural relations, as well as to the court. The author argues that this approach destroys the integrity of the concept of not only procedural capacity, but also procedural legal capacity. Separately, the author examines the issue of the need to involve citizens recognized by the court as legally incompetent to participate in person in court proceedings. Attention is drawn to the problem of ensuring adequate protection of the rights of citizens recognized by the court as legally incompetent, which is relevant in practice and unresolved in civil procedural legislation.
民事诉讼能力和法律能力理论的发展(纪念玛丽亚-沙卡良教授)
本文旨在纪念俄罗斯苏维埃联邦社会主义共和国荣誉律师、法学博士玛丽亚-沙卡利扬教授。本文重点介绍了民事诉讼法律行为能力和法律行为能力理论发展的一些历史方面,强调了玛丽亚-莎卡良教授对这些类别的研究做出的贡献。论文指出,沙卡良教授在其著作中提出的许多问题至今在民事诉讼法学中仍存在争议。作者特别关注向诉讼关系的所有参与者以及法院传播诉讼能力和法律能力的概念。作者认为,这种做法不仅破坏了诉讼能力概念的完整性,也破坏了诉讼法律能力概念的完整性。另外,作者还探讨了被法院认定为无法律行为能力的公民是否有必要亲自参与法院诉讼的问题。作者提请注意确保充分保护被法院认定为无法律行为能力的公民的权利问题,这一问题在实践中具有现实意义,但在民事诉讼立法中尚未得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信