The Examination of Teachers' Professional Autonomy

Sezin Erbıyık, Fatma Köybaşı Şemin
{"title":"The Examination of Teachers' Professional Autonomy","authors":"Sezin Erbıyık, Fatma Köybaşı Şemin","doi":"10.53444/deubefd.1364946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to determine the views and opinions of teachers regarding professional autonomy. This study is a qualitative research and it is conducted as a phenomenological study. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured interview. The study group consists of 40 teachers who work in schools affiliated with the Ministry of National Education in Sivas province during the 2020-2021 academic year. Maximum diversity sampling was preferred in the research, and the collected data were analyzed through content analysis. Participants interpreted the concept of teacher autonomy as the ability to act independently and have authority at every stage of education. Most participants stated that they did not feel autonomous in the dimensions of \"Curriculum Development,\" \"Curriculum Implementation,\" and \"Assessment and Evaluation,\" while they felt autonomous in the dimensions of \"Classroom Management\" and \"Lesson Material Preparation.\" Participants believe that autonomous teaching would support students in acquiring independent learning skills, enable adjustments to be made based on students' readiness in the instructional process, and enhance effectiveness in problem-solving by participating in decision-making processes. The majority of participants stated that many \"school administrations\" restrict teacher autonomy and that \"unions\" do not have supportive efforts for teacher autonomy.","PeriodicalId":514151,"journal":{"name":"Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":"52 1-2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1364946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the views and opinions of teachers regarding professional autonomy. This study is a qualitative research and it is conducted as a phenomenological study. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured interview. The study group consists of 40 teachers who work in schools affiliated with the Ministry of National Education in Sivas province during the 2020-2021 academic year. Maximum diversity sampling was preferred in the research, and the collected data were analyzed through content analysis. Participants interpreted the concept of teacher autonomy as the ability to act independently and have authority at every stage of education. Most participants stated that they did not feel autonomous in the dimensions of "Curriculum Development," "Curriculum Implementation," and "Assessment and Evaluation," while they felt autonomous in the dimensions of "Classroom Management" and "Lesson Material Preparation." Participants believe that autonomous teaching would support students in acquiring independent learning skills, enable adjustments to be made based on students' readiness in the instructional process, and enhance effectiveness in problem-solving by participating in decision-making processes. The majority of participants stated that many "school administrations" restrict teacher autonomy and that "unions" do not have supportive efforts for teacher autonomy.
考察教师的专业自主权
本研究的目的是了解教师对专业自主的看法和意见。本研究是一项定性研究,以现象学研究的形式进行。采用半结构化访谈法,通过面对面访谈收集数据。研究小组由 40 名教师组成,他们于 2020-2021 学年在锡瓦斯省国家教育部下属学校工作。研究采用了最大多样性抽样,并通过内容分析法对收集到的数据进行了分析。参与者将教师自主权的概念解释为在教育的每个阶段独立行事和拥有权力的能力。大多数参与者表示,他们在 "课程开发"、"课程实施 "和 "评估与评价 "方面没有自主感,而在 "课堂管理 "和 "教材准备 "方面有自主感。学员们认为,自主教学有助于学生掌握自主学习的技能,能够根据学生在教学过程中的准备情况进行调整,并通过参与决策过程提高解决问题的效率。大多数参与者表示,许多 "学校管理部门 "限制了教师的自主权,"工会 "也没有为教师的自主权提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信