Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Postpartum Contraceptives Method Choice (IUD vs Tubectomy) and Characteristic Aspects: A Retrospective Descriptive Study

Q4 Medicine
Asih Anggraeni, Grace Siagian, Hafi Nurinasari, Syah Rini Wisdayanti, Sri Sulistyowati, Soetrisno
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Postpartum Contraceptives Method Choice (IUD vs Tubectomy) and Characteristic Aspects: A Retrospective Descriptive Study","authors":"Asih Anggraeni, Grace Siagian, Hafi Nurinasari, Syah Rini Wisdayanti, Sri Sulistyowati, Soetrisno","doi":"10.32771/inajog.v12i1.1966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum contraceptive methods. \nMethods: This retrospective descriptive study was conducted at a single secondary center, utilizing secondary data retrieved from medical records at the Inpatient Installation of Sebelas Maret University Hospital, Surakarta, covering the period from January 2020 to January 2022. \nResults: Among users of intra-uterine devices (IUDs), 85% were below 35 years old, 65% were primiparous, 67% had a history of previous injectable contraceptive use, 79% received routine antenatal care, and 51% had education below a college level. These individuals were educated about the importance of contraceptive programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sixty-six percent of IUD insertions were conducted via vaginal delivery, and 27% had health facilities within less than 1 km. In contrast, tubectomy contraceptive users comprised 106 patients, with the majority (54%) being aged 35 years or older, all being multiparous, and 25% tested positive for COVID-19. Among tubectomy users, 43% had a history of previous injectable contraceptive use, 85% received routine antenatal care, and 54% had education below a college level. Similar to the IUD group, they were educated about the significance of contraceptive programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eighty-four percent of tubectomies were performed via cesarean section, and 27% of patients lived within less than 1 km from health facilities. \nConclusion: The usage rates of intra-uterine devices and tubectomy for contraceptives remained stable during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there was a decrease in postpartum in-person visits and mobility, coupled with an increase in hospitalizations.Keywords: contraceptive; family planning; intrauterine device; tubectomy","PeriodicalId":13477,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32771/inajog.v12i1.1966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum contraceptive methods. Methods: This retrospective descriptive study was conducted at a single secondary center, utilizing secondary data retrieved from medical records at the Inpatient Installation of Sebelas Maret University Hospital, Surakarta, covering the period from January 2020 to January 2022. Results: Among users of intra-uterine devices (IUDs), 85% were below 35 years old, 65% were primiparous, 67% had a history of previous injectable contraceptive use, 79% received routine antenatal care, and 51% had education below a college level. These individuals were educated about the importance of contraceptive programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sixty-six percent of IUD insertions were conducted via vaginal delivery, and 27% had health facilities within less than 1 km. In contrast, tubectomy contraceptive users comprised 106 patients, with the majority (54%) being aged 35 years or older, all being multiparous, and 25% tested positive for COVID-19. Among tubectomy users, 43% had a history of previous injectable contraceptive use, 85% received routine antenatal care, and 54% had education below a college level. Similar to the IUD group, they were educated about the significance of contraceptive programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eighty-four percent of tubectomies were performed via cesarean section, and 27% of patients lived within less than 1 km from health facilities. Conclusion: The usage rates of intra-uterine devices and tubectomy for contraceptives remained stable during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there was a decrease in postpartum in-person visits and mobility, coupled with an increase in hospitalizations.Keywords: contraceptive; family planning; intrauterine device; tubectomy
COVID-19 大流行对产后避孕方法选择(宫内节育器与输卵管切除术)和特征方面的影响:回顾性描述研究
研究目的本研究旨在评估 COVID-19 大流行对产后避孕方法的影响。研究方法这项回顾性描述性研究在一个二级中心进行,利用从苏腊卡尔塔 Sebelas Maret 大学医院住院部病历中获取的二级数据,时间跨度为 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月。研究结果在宫内节育器(IUD)使用者中,85%的人年龄在35岁以下,65%为初产妇,67%曾使用过注射避孕药,79%接受过常规产前护理,51%的人学历在大专以下。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,这些人接受了有关避孕计划重要性的教育。66%的宫内节育器放置是通过阴道分娩进行的,27%的宫内节育器放置地点的医疗机构距离不到 1 公里。与此形成鲜明对比的是,使用输卵管切除术避孕的 106 名患者中,大多数(54%)年龄在 35 岁或 35 岁以上,全部为多胎妊娠,25% 的患者 COVID-19 检测呈阳性。在输卵管切除术使用者中,43%曾使用过注射避孕药,85%接受过常规产前护理,54%的受教育程度低于大学水平。与宫内节育器使用者类似,他们也接受了有关 COVID-19 大流行期间避孕计划重要性的教育。84%的输卵管切除术是通过剖腹产进行的,27%的患者居住地距离医疗机构不足 1 公里。结论在 COVID-19 大流行期间,宫内节育器和输卵管切除术的使用率保持稳定。然而,产后亲自就诊率和流动性下降,住院率上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信