When the Background Looms Large over the Foreground: Medical Professionals, Diplomats, and Co-Managing SARS-CoV-2

Markus Kornprobst, Stephanie Strobl
{"title":"When the Background Looms Large over the Foreground: Medical Professionals, Diplomats, and Co-Managing SARS-CoV-2","authors":"Markus Kornprobst, Stephanie Strobl","doi":"10.1093/isagsq/ksae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) is the highest alert that the World Health Organization (WHO) can issue. Even though the International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) prescribe tight deadlines and an expeditious decision-making process to determine such a PHEIC, it took many weeks for the alert to be declared to counter the spread of SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus). What explains the delay? Drawing from recent advances in the literature on international orders, our argument zooms in on the troubled relations between medical professionals and diplomats. Practices enacting a hierarchical relationship between the medical and diplomatic communities of practice (background) undermined crucial parts of the decision-making mechanism laid out in the IHR, which puts medical professionals in a strong position (foreground). This study contributes to a better understanding of PHEICs, global health governance, and, beyond this, to how actors employing different lenses to make sense of the world fail or succeed to manage crises together. Our findings also have important policy implications for discussions about a Pandemic Treaty.","PeriodicalId":380017,"journal":{"name":"Global Studies Quarterly","volume":"54 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) is the highest alert that the World Health Organization (WHO) can issue. Even though the International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) prescribe tight deadlines and an expeditious decision-making process to determine such a PHEIC, it took many weeks for the alert to be declared to counter the spread of SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus). What explains the delay? Drawing from recent advances in the literature on international orders, our argument zooms in on the troubled relations between medical professionals and diplomats. Practices enacting a hierarchical relationship between the medical and diplomatic communities of practice (background) undermined crucial parts of the decision-making mechanism laid out in the IHR, which puts medical professionals in a strong position (foreground). This study contributes to a better understanding of PHEICs, global health governance, and, beyond this, to how actors employing different lenses to make sense of the world fail or succeed to manage crises together. Our findings also have important policy implications for discussions about a Pandemic Treaty.
当 "背景 "凌驾于 "前景 "之上时:医疗专业人员、外交官和共同管理 SARS-CoV-2
国际关注的突发公共卫生事件(PHEIC)是世界卫生组织(WHO)可以发布的最高级别警报。尽管《国际卫生条例》(IHR 2005)规定了确定此类 "国际关注的公共卫生紧急状况 "的紧迫期限和快速决策程序,但为了应对 SARS-CoV-2(冠状病毒)的传播,宣布警报却花了好几个星期。延误的原因何在?借鉴国际秩序文献的最新进展,我们将论点放大到医疗专业人员与外交官之间令人不安的关系上。医疗界和外交界之间的等级关系(背景)破坏了《国际卫生条例》所规定的决策机制的关键部分,而该机制使医疗专业人员处于强势地位(前景)。本研究有助于更好地理解公共卫生紧急事件、全球卫生治理,以及使用不同视角来认识世界的行动者是如何失败或成功地共同管理危机的。我们的研究结果还对有关《大流行病条约》的讨论具有重要的政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信