Reorientacja Polski z „Kresów Wschodnich” na Bałtyk i morski kod nowoczesności w dyskursie polskim dwudziestolecia międzywojennego (ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem reportażu)

Jagoda Wierzejska
{"title":"Reorientacja Polski z „Kresów Wschodnich” na Bałtyk i morski kod nowoczesności w dyskursie polskim dwudziestolecia międzywojennego (ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem reportażu)","authors":"Jagoda Wierzejska","doi":"10.31338/2657-599x.ph.2023-3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides an analysis of the Polish discourse concerning the phenomenon of Poland’s reorientation towards the Baltic Sea and an innovative ideological project of the “Maritime Poland” in the interwar period. Poland’s traditional geopolitical orientation used to be directed towards the East and South-East, primarily towards the lands of today’s Dnieper Ukraine, called in Polish the “Eastern Borderlands”. Such orientation had a colonial character, was ideologically rooted in Sarmatism and strongly stimulated by the Union of Lublin (1569). At the turn of the 20th century, an increasing number of Polish discourse’s manifestations started call- ing for revision of Poland’s traditional ties with that macro-region and its entanglement in conflicts that had led to the collapse of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. These voices pointed to the need to orient future Poland towards the Baltic Sea as a condition for Poland’s geopolitical and even national existence. The regaining of independence, together with access to the sea and the construction of the city and port of Gdynia gave a definite shape to Poland’s once hypothetical maritime orientation. This achievement was associated not only with the development of modern architecture, urban planning and the geopolitical configuration of the “New Europe”, but also with the development of the “Maritime Poland”, an ideological project which constituted a kind of “text” accompanying and stimulating the development of Gdynia. The text spoke, on the one hand, about the importance of the Baltic Sea for the Polish state and its economy, and on the other, about building a new cultural identity for Poland, a modern identity for its citizens and modernist values in individual and collective life. This article deals with the latter – cultural – aspect of the “Maritime Poland” project. The analysis is conduct- ed based on emanations of Polish discourse primarily in the period between 1918 and 1939, with a particular focus on discourse in the reportage genre.","PeriodicalId":239308,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Humanistyczny","volume":"169 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Humanistyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31338/2657-599x.ph.2023-3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article provides an analysis of the Polish discourse concerning the phenomenon of Poland’s reorientation towards the Baltic Sea and an innovative ideological project of the “Maritime Poland” in the interwar period. Poland’s traditional geopolitical orientation used to be directed towards the East and South-East, primarily towards the lands of today’s Dnieper Ukraine, called in Polish the “Eastern Borderlands”. Such orientation had a colonial character, was ideologically rooted in Sarmatism and strongly stimulated by the Union of Lublin (1569). At the turn of the 20th century, an increasing number of Polish discourse’s manifestations started call- ing for revision of Poland’s traditional ties with that macro-region and its entanglement in conflicts that had led to the collapse of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. These voices pointed to the need to orient future Poland towards the Baltic Sea as a condition for Poland’s geopolitical and even national existence. The regaining of independence, together with access to the sea and the construction of the city and port of Gdynia gave a definite shape to Poland’s once hypothetical maritime orientation. This achievement was associated not only with the development of modern architecture, urban planning and the geopolitical configuration of the “New Europe”, but also with the development of the “Maritime Poland”, an ideological project which constituted a kind of “text” accompanying and stimulating the development of Gdynia. The text spoke, on the one hand, about the importance of the Baltic Sea for the Polish state and its economy, and on the other, about building a new cultural identity for Poland, a modern identity for its citizens and modernist values in individual and collective life. This article deals with the latter – cultural – aspect of the “Maritime Poland” project. The analysis is conduct- ed based on emanations of Polish discourse primarily in the period between 1918 and 1939, with a particular focus on discourse in the reportage genre.
波兰从 "东部边疆 "到波罗的海的重新定位以及战时波兰话语中的现代性海洋密码(特别是报告文学)
文章分析了波兰关于波罗的海方向调整现象的论述,以及战时 "海上波兰 "的创新意识形态项目。波兰传统的地缘政治方向曾经是面向东方和东南方,主要是今天的第聂伯乌克兰(波兰语称为 "东部边疆")。这种定位具有殖民性质,在意识形态上根植于萨尔马特主义,并受到卢布林联盟(1569 年)的强烈刺激。20 世纪之交,越来越多的波兰言论开始呼吁修正波兰与这一宏观地区的传统关系,以及波兰与导致波兰-立陶宛联邦解体的冲突的纠葛。这些声音指出,未来的波兰必须面向波罗的海,这是波兰地缘政治乃至国家生存的条件。重新获得独立,加上出海口以及格丁尼亚城市和港口的建设,使波兰曾经假定的海洋方向有了明确的雏形。这一成就不仅与现代建筑的发展、城市规划和 "新欧洲 "的地缘政治格局有关,还与 "海上波兰 "的发展有关。"海上波兰 "是一个意识形态项目,它构成了一种 "文本",伴随并激励着格丁尼亚的发展。该文本一方面论述了波罗的海对波兰国家及其经济的重要性,另一方面也论述了为波兰建立新的文化身份、公民的现代身份以及个人和集体生活中的现代主义价值观。本文论述的是 "海上波兰 "项目的文化方面。分析主要基于 1918 年至 1939 年期间波兰的言论,尤其侧重于报告文学体裁的言论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信