Applauding or Criticising the Announcement of the Best School and Student in the National Examination: Which Way to Go?

CRN, Charles Raphael
{"title":"Applauding or Criticising the Announcement of the Best School and Student in the National Examination: Which Way to Go?","authors":"CRN, Charles Raphael","doi":"10.61538/jipe.v16i.1429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 29th January 2023, the National Examination Council of Tanzania (NECTA) stopped announcing the best-performing schools and students. The announcement drew mixed reactions (some applauding or criticising) among education stakeholders. Using a descriptive survey design, this quantitative study specifically identified reasons for the applause or criticism; compared statistically the identified reasons; and the private and public education stakeholders on the announcement. The questionnaires were used to collect data from 500 stakeholders who were selected through a multi-stage sampling technique in Arusha, Dar es Salaam, Mwanza, Mbeya, and Dodoma cities. The collected data were analysed using Descriptive Statistics and Independent t-tests. The findings indicate that, the applauding reasons include different study environments; no longer motivation for studying, improved understanding and restoring original logic of schooling. Other reasons are the announcement served no good purpose; the announcement marketed the schools; and it was not fair to compare schools using the British and NECTA systems.  Contrarily, the criticism reasons are the Government escapism from under-investment in public schools; denying of information to education researchers; suppressing information and putting society in the dark; removing the incentives for students; cause unforeseen consequences;  leader’s in-charge subjectivity/selfishness move and the Council ignores the foundational reason for the announcement. Furthermore, there is a very minimal statistically significant difference between the reasons for applauding (M=3.611, SD=.825) and the reasons for criticising (M=3.645, SD=.829) the announcement.  The t-test results portrayed no statistically significant difference between the private and public education stakeholders on the announcement. Therefore, none is more powerful than the other between the applause and criticism of the announcement. The private and public education stakeholders should look for an alternative approach to improving results in the national examinations than depending on the announcement of the best schools and students.","PeriodicalId":516283,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ISSUES AND PRACTICE IN EDUCATION","volume":"148 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ISSUES AND PRACTICE IN EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61538/jipe.v16i.1429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 29th January 2023, the National Examination Council of Tanzania (NECTA) stopped announcing the best-performing schools and students. The announcement drew mixed reactions (some applauding or criticising) among education stakeholders. Using a descriptive survey design, this quantitative study specifically identified reasons for the applause or criticism; compared statistically the identified reasons; and the private and public education stakeholders on the announcement. The questionnaires were used to collect data from 500 stakeholders who were selected through a multi-stage sampling technique in Arusha, Dar es Salaam, Mwanza, Mbeya, and Dodoma cities. The collected data were analysed using Descriptive Statistics and Independent t-tests. The findings indicate that, the applauding reasons include different study environments; no longer motivation for studying, improved understanding and restoring original logic of schooling. Other reasons are the announcement served no good purpose; the announcement marketed the schools; and it was not fair to compare schools using the British and NECTA systems.  Contrarily, the criticism reasons are the Government escapism from under-investment in public schools; denying of information to education researchers; suppressing information and putting society in the dark; removing the incentives for students; cause unforeseen consequences;  leader’s in-charge subjectivity/selfishness move and the Council ignores the foundational reason for the announcement. Furthermore, there is a very minimal statistically significant difference between the reasons for applauding (M=3.611, SD=.825) and the reasons for criticising (M=3.645, SD=.829) the announcement.  The t-test results portrayed no statistically significant difference between the private and public education stakeholders on the announcement. Therefore, none is more powerful than the other between the applause and criticism of the announcement. The private and public education stakeholders should look for an alternative approach to improving results in the national examinations than depending on the announcement of the best schools and students.
为公布全国考试最佳学校和学生喝彩还是批评?何去何从?
2023 年 1 月 29 日,坦桑尼亚国家考试委员会(NECTA)停止公布成绩最好的学校和学生。这一宣布在教育利益相关者中引起了不同的反应(有的鼓掌,有的批评)。本定量研究采用描述性调查设计,具体确定了鼓掌或批评的原因;对确定的原因进行了统计比较;以及私立和公立教育利益相关者对公告的看法。通过多阶段抽样技术,在阿鲁沙、达累斯萨拉姆、姆万扎、姆贝亚和多多马等城市选取了 500 名利益相关者,使用调查问卷收集数据。收集到的数据使用描述性统计和独立 t 检验进行分析。研究结果表明,值得称赞的原因包括:学习环境不同;不再有学习动力;理解能力提高;恢复学校教育的原有逻辑。其他原因包括:公告没有达到良好的目的;公告推销了学校;使用英国和 NECTA 系统对学校进行比较不公平。 相反,批评的理由是政府逃避对公立学校的投资不足;拒绝向教育研究人员提供信息;压制信息,将社会蒙在鼓里;取消对学生的激励;造成不可预见的后果;领导者的主观/自私举动以及理事会忽视了发布公告的根本原因。此外,在统计意义上,为公告鼓掌的原因(M=3.611,SD=.825)与为公告提出批评的原因(M=3.645,SD=.829)之间的差异极小。 t 检验结果表明,私立和公立教育利益相关者对公告的评价在统计上没有显著差异。因此,在对公告的掌声和批评声中,谁也不比谁更有力。私立和公立教育的利益相关者应寻找其他方法来提高国家考试的成绩,而不是依赖于公布最好的学校和学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信