{"title":"Motivation and responsibility of employees of primary health care facilities: results of a social survey on current motivation measures","authors":"O. Drapkina, A. Senenko, R. Shepel","doi":"10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To study the relevance of motivation measures based on the survey of medical staff.Material and methods. Medical staff of adult primary health care facilities was surveyed using an original questionnaire regarding the organization of work, the importance of financial and non-financial incentives. The survey was strictly voluntary and anonymous, and conducted electronically and on paper. In total, 35191 questionnaires were accepted for processing. Processing was carried out using the method of descriptive statistics.Results. The organization of work environment is of the greatest importance to respondents (>80%), while in second place is the presence of clear criteria for work efficiency assessment, and in third place — a clear incentive and penal scheme. Respondents rated the opportunity for contact with the administration more highly than \"communicating work assessment criteria to employees\". The undisputed top in financial incentives is payments for high performance criteria in all categories of personnel. Of the non-financial measures, the most popular were a letter of gratitude from the manager and permission to independently plan working hours (maximum among medical specialists (51%)).Conclusion. The results obtained make it possible to highlight the main directions for motivation system of medical staff as follows: clear evaluation criteria for all personnel categories, provision of conditions for fulfilling the developed criteria, active outreach on evaluation criteria, incentive payments and other measures of material incentives, development of targeted incentive technologies, feedback with employees on issues related to their performance, working conditions, etc., developing a system of non-financial incentives and corporate culture.","PeriodicalId":9545,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim. To study the relevance of motivation measures based on the survey of medical staff.Material and methods. Medical staff of adult primary health care facilities was surveyed using an original questionnaire regarding the organization of work, the importance of financial and non-financial incentives. The survey was strictly voluntary and anonymous, and conducted electronically and on paper. In total, 35191 questionnaires were accepted for processing. Processing was carried out using the method of descriptive statistics.Results. The organization of work environment is of the greatest importance to respondents (>80%), while in second place is the presence of clear criteria for work efficiency assessment, and in third place — a clear incentive and penal scheme. Respondents rated the opportunity for contact with the administration more highly than "communicating work assessment criteria to employees". The undisputed top in financial incentives is payments for high performance criteria in all categories of personnel. Of the non-financial measures, the most popular were a letter of gratitude from the manager and permission to independently plan working hours (maximum among medical specialists (51%)).Conclusion. The results obtained make it possible to highlight the main directions for motivation system of medical staff as follows: clear evaluation criteria for all personnel categories, provision of conditions for fulfilling the developed criteria, active outreach on evaluation criteria, incentive payments and other measures of material incentives, development of targeted incentive technologies, feedback with employees on issues related to their performance, working conditions, etc., developing a system of non-financial incentives and corporate culture.
期刊介绍:
The most important objectives of the journal are: the generalization of scientific and practical achievements in the field of cardiology, increasing scientific and practical skills of cardiologists.
The scientific concept of publication does the publication of modern achievements in the field of epidemiology, prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, the results of research, national and international clinical trials.
For publication in the journal are invited both domestic and foreign scientists and clinicians working in the field of cardiology, as well as doctors of other specialties.
The magazine covers various issues in cardiology and related specialties. Each issue is prepared by Executive editor of the issue, a respected specialist in the field of epidemiology, prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.
The main focus of the publication — scientific articles on original research, the pharmacotherapy of cardiovascular disease, new diagnostic methods.
All members of the group of authors should meet all four criteria of authorship set forth in the ICMJE recommendations: 1) concept and design development or data analysis and interpretation, and 2) manuscript justification or verification of critical intellectual content, and 3) final approval for publication of the manuscript, and 4) consent to be responsible for all aspects of the work, and assume that issues relating to the thoroughness and diligent execution of any part of the study submitted are duly investigated and resolved.
Great importance the editors attached to the preparation of scientific papers by groups of authors at a high level, literacy, authors, and their ownership information, availability of research results not only to colleagues in Russia, but also abroad.