The Nassar Scale as an Instrument for Predicting Conversionof Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy

Edin Hodžić, Sadat Pušina, Adi Mulabdić, Adnan Kulo, Salem Bajramagić, M. Salibašić, Emsad Halilović, Amila Feto, Samir Delibegović
{"title":"The Nassar Scale as an Instrument for Predicting Conversionof Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy","authors":"Edin Hodžić, Sadat Pušina, Adi Mulabdić, Adnan Kulo, Salem Bajramagić, M. Salibašić, Emsad Halilović, Amila Feto, Samir Delibegović","doi":"10.55791/s79fjc03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Difficult cholecystectomy, often associated with a heightened risk of complications, poses a significant surgical dilemma. Risk factors, such as patient age, increased body weight, the presence of gallstones, acute cholecystitis, and prior abdominal surgeries, can complicate laparoscopic cholecystectomy and necessitate conver- sion to an open procedure for safety. The aim of our study was to assess the applicability of the Nassar scale in predicting the need for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.Material and methods: In our prospective cohort study, we included 85 patients who underwent either emergency or elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy between December 2021 and October 2023. The Nassar scale was used to assess the complexity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, incorporating parameters such as ‘Gallbladder,’ ‘Cystic pedicle,’and ‘Adhesions’ to determine a final score ranging from 1 to 5. Statistical analysis involved descriptive and analytical methods, with the significance threshold set at p < 0.05.Results: ANOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the duration of operative procedures with different Nassar grades (p < 0.001). An increase in the Nassar grade by 1 was associated with a statistically significant6.23-fold increase in the odds of conversion to an open procedure (p < 0.001). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated a highly significant association (p < 0.001) between the Nassar grade and the conversion event, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.881 (95% CI 0.79,0.96). The optimal cutoff value, identified as >2.5, struck a balance between sensitivity (0.86) and 1-specificity (0.23). Conclusion: Our study underscores the utility of the Nassar scale in surgical practice. It provides valuable insights into assessing the severity of operations, facilitating informed decision-making, and optimizing treatment outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institution.","PeriodicalId":517463,"journal":{"name":"South-East European Endo-Surgery Journal","volume":"47 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South-East European Endo-Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55791/s79fjc03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Difficult cholecystectomy, often associated with a heightened risk of complications, poses a significant surgical dilemma. Risk factors, such as patient age, increased body weight, the presence of gallstones, acute cholecystitis, and prior abdominal surgeries, can complicate laparoscopic cholecystectomy and necessitate conver- sion to an open procedure for safety. The aim of our study was to assess the applicability of the Nassar scale in predicting the need for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.Material and methods: In our prospective cohort study, we included 85 patients who underwent either emergency or elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy between December 2021 and October 2023. The Nassar scale was used to assess the complexity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, incorporating parameters such as ‘Gallbladder,’ ‘Cystic pedicle,’and ‘Adhesions’ to determine a final score ranging from 1 to 5. Statistical analysis involved descriptive and analytical methods, with the significance threshold set at p < 0.05.Results: ANOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the duration of operative procedures with different Nassar grades (p < 0.001). An increase in the Nassar grade by 1 was associated with a statistically significant6.23-fold increase in the odds of conversion to an open procedure (p < 0.001). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated a highly significant association (p < 0.001) between the Nassar grade and the conversion event, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.881 (95% CI 0.79,0.96). The optimal cutoff value, identified as >2.5, struck a balance between sensitivity (0.86) and 1-specificity (0.23). Conclusion: Our study underscores the utility of the Nassar scale in surgical practice. It provides valuable insights into assessing the severity of operations, facilitating informed decision-making, and optimizing treatment outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institution.
预测从腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术的纳萨尔量表
背景:疑难胆囊切除术通常伴随着更高的并发症风险,是一个重大的外科难题。患者年龄、体重增加、存在胆结石、急性胆囊炎和曾接受过腹部手术等风险因素都可能导致腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症,为了安全起见,有必要转为开腹手术。我们的研究旨在评估纳萨尔量表在预测从腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术的必要性方面的适用性:在前瞻性队列研究中,我们纳入了在2021年12月至2023年10月期间接受急诊或择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的85名患者。纳萨尔量表用于评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术的复杂性,将 "胆囊"、"囊蒂 "和 "粘连 "等参数纳入其中,以确定 1 至 5 分的最终得分。统计分析包括描述性和分析性方法,显著性阈值设定为 p <0.05:方差分析显示,不同纳萨尔等级的手术时间差异显著(p < 0.001)。Nassar 分级每增加 1 级,转为开放手术的几率就会增加 6.23 倍,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。受试者操作特征(ROC)分析表明,纳萨尔分级与转为开放手术的几率之间存在非常显著的相关性(p < 0.001),曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.881(95% CI 0.79,0.96)。最佳临界值为 >2.5,在敏感性(0.86)和特异性(0.23)之间取得了平衡。结论我们的研究强调了纳萨尔量表在外科实践中的实用性。它为评估手术的严重程度、促进知情决策以及优化本院腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的治疗效果提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书