Vocal Load of University Professors: Preliminary Results

Cristiane Lemos Carvalho de Oliveira, Denise Nunes Viola, Tarciane Machado Miranda, Marcelo Santos de Souza, Maria Lúcia Vaz Masson
{"title":"Vocal Load of University Professors: Preliminary Results","authors":"Cristiane Lemos Carvalho de Oliveira, Denise Nunes Viola, Tarciane Machado Miranda, Marcelo Santos de Souza, Maria Lúcia Vaz Masson","doi":"10.46634/riics.241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. To describe the acoustic characteristics of a classroom, voice quality, fatigue, and vocal load of university professors.\nMethods. Exploratory, observational, longitudinal, and descriptive study with a single group of participants, including vocal monitoring data over two weeks. Acoustic characterization of the classroom, perceptual-auditory evaluation, and acoustic analysis of voice samples were conducted before and after classes. Vocal dosimetry was performed during classes, and the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) was assessed at the beginning of each week. Descriptive analysis of the findings was conducted, and randomization test was performed to verify the internal reliability of the judge.\nResults. All participants reported speaking loudly in the classroom, with the majority reporting vocal changes in the past six months, and only one participant reported a current vocal change. The classroom had acoustical measures and estimations that deviated from established standards. The professors used high vocal intensities during classes. After the classes, an increase in the absolute values of the aggregated data for CAPE-V, jitter, and fundamental frequency was found, varying within the range of normality. Furthermore, there was an observed increase in both post-lesson intensity and VFI when comparing the two-week period.\nConclusions. Vocal intensities and VFI were possibly impacted by the acoustics of the classroom. The increase in average VFI between the weeks may be attributed to a cumulative fatigue sensation. Further research with a larger number of participants and in acoustically conditioned classrooms is suggested in order to evaluate collective intervention proposals aimed at reducing the vocal load on teachers.","PeriodicalId":508578,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. To describe the acoustic characteristics of a classroom, voice quality, fatigue, and vocal load of university professors. Methods. Exploratory, observational, longitudinal, and descriptive study with a single group of participants, including vocal monitoring data over two weeks. Acoustic characterization of the classroom, perceptual-auditory evaluation, and acoustic analysis of voice samples were conducted before and after classes. Vocal dosimetry was performed during classes, and the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) was assessed at the beginning of each week. Descriptive analysis of the findings was conducted, and randomization test was performed to verify the internal reliability of the judge. Results. All participants reported speaking loudly in the classroom, with the majority reporting vocal changes in the past six months, and only one participant reported a current vocal change. The classroom had acoustical measures and estimations that deviated from established standards. The professors used high vocal intensities during classes. After the classes, an increase in the absolute values of the aggregated data for CAPE-V, jitter, and fundamental frequency was found, varying within the range of normality. Furthermore, there was an observed increase in both post-lesson intensity and VFI when comparing the two-week period. Conclusions. Vocal intensities and VFI were possibly impacted by the acoustics of the classroom. The increase in average VFI between the weeks may be attributed to a cumulative fatigue sensation. Further research with a larger number of participants and in acoustically conditioned classrooms is suggested in order to evaluate collective intervention proposals aimed at reducing the vocal load on teachers.
大学教授的嗓音负荷:初步结果
目的描述大学教授的课堂声学特征、嗓音质量、疲劳度和发声负荷。对一组参与者进行探索性、观察性、纵向和描述性研究,包括两周内的发声监测数据。在课前和课后对教室进行了声学特征描述、知觉-听觉评估,并对声音样本进行了声学分析。在上课期间进行声乐剂量测定,并在每周开始时评估声乐疲劳指数(VFI)。对研究结果进行了描述性分析,并进行了随机测试以验证评判的内部可靠性。所有参与者都表示在课堂上说话声音很大,大多数人表示在过去六个月中声音发生了变化,只有一名参与者表示目前声音发生了变化。教室的声学测量和估计偏离了既定标准。教授们在上课时使用了高强度的声音。课后发现,CAPE-V、抖动和基频综合数据的绝对值有所增加,变化范围在正常范围内。此外,与两周期间相比,课后强度和 VFI 都有所提高。声强和 VFI 可能受到教室声学的影响。两周之间平均 VFI 的增加可能是由于疲劳感的累积。为了评估旨在减轻教师发声负担的集体干预建议,建议对更多参与者和声学条件教室进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信