Surgical Shunting Versus Trans-Jugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Recurrent Variceal Bleeding in Portal Hypertension Due to Liver Cirrhosis: An Evidence-Based Case Report

N. Magfira, Arie Rozzaqi Nurrafiani, C. Jasirwan, R. Suhartono
{"title":"Surgical Shunting Versus Trans-Jugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Recurrent Variceal Bleeding in Portal Hypertension Due to Liver Cirrhosis: An Evidence-Based Case Report","authors":"N. Magfira, Arie Rozzaqi Nurrafiani, C. Jasirwan, R. Suhartono","doi":"10.24871/2432023264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This evidence-based case report aims to determine whether the surgical shunt is better than the trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to prevent re-bleeding in patients with portal hypertension due to liver cirrhosis.  Method: Literature searching was performed in 4 online databases, Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS. Three meta-analyses were appraised critically.Results: Of all meta-analyses included, the internal validities were poor and only included a small number of trials. However, the results show that surgical shunt is better for preventing variceal re-bleeding with varied heterogeneities.Conclusion: Surgical shunts may have benefits over TIPS in preventing variceal re-bleeding. ","PeriodicalId":515400,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"101 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24871/2432023264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This evidence-based case report aims to determine whether the surgical shunt is better than the trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to prevent re-bleeding in patients with portal hypertension due to liver cirrhosis.  Method: Literature searching was performed in 4 online databases, Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS. Three meta-analyses were appraised critically.Results: Of all meta-analyses included, the internal validities were poor and only included a small number of trials. However, the results show that surgical shunt is better for preventing variceal re-bleeding with varied heterogeneities.Conclusion: Surgical shunts may have benefits over TIPS in preventing variceal re-bleeding. 
手术分流与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝硬化导致的门静脉高压症复发性静脉曲张出血:循证病例报告
目的:本循证病例报告旨在确定手术分流术是否比经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)更能预防肝硬化导致的门静脉高压症患者再次出血。 方法:在 Cochrane、PubMed、Embase 和 SCOPUS 4 个在线数据库中进行文献检索。对三项荟萃分析进行了严格评估:结果:在所有纳入的荟萃分析中,内部有效性较差,仅纳入了少量试验。然而,结果显示,手术分流在预防静脉曲张再出血方面效果更好,但存在不同的异质性:结论:在预防静脉曲张再出血方面,手术分流术可能比 TIPS 更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信