{"title":"Bottom’s up for listening","authors":"Elizabeth M. Kissling","doi":"10.1075/jslp.23052.kis","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This report explains the teaching decisions made in Kissling (2018).\n The original study measured the effect of explicit pronunciation instruction (PI) on the listening comprehension of beginning L2\n Spanish learners (n = 116), as measured via accuracy on a dictation task (intelligibility) and ratings of\n perceived difficulty (comprehension). Learners either received PI that focused on segmentals or PI that focused on\n suprasegmentals, followed by practice either producing or perceiving those same sounds. The original article reported that all\n groups, including a control group, improved over time, but the suprasegmental PI followed by perception-focused practice had the\n largest effect on intelligibility, whereas the segmental PI followed by production-focused practice had the largest effect on\n comprehensibility, suggesting that all instructional approaches have value. The current report explains in greater detail the\n teaching decisions made in Kissling (2018), including the classes recruited, materials\n development, and PI presentation.","PeriodicalId":91766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of second language pronunciation","volume":"141 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of second language pronunciation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.23052.kis","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This report explains the teaching decisions made in Kissling (2018).
The original study measured the effect of explicit pronunciation instruction (PI) on the listening comprehension of beginning L2
Spanish learners (n = 116), as measured via accuracy on a dictation task (intelligibility) and ratings of
perceived difficulty (comprehension). Learners either received PI that focused on segmentals or PI that focused on
suprasegmentals, followed by practice either producing or perceiving those same sounds. The original article reported that all
groups, including a control group, improved over time, but the suprasegmental PI followed by perception-focused practice had the
largest effect on intelligibility, whereas the segmental PI followed by production-focused practice had the largest effect on
comprehensibility, suggesting that all instructional approaches have value. The current report explains in greater detail the
teaching decisions made in Kissling (2018), including the classes recruited, materials
development, and PI presentation.
本报告解释了 Kissling(2018)的教学决策。最初的研究通过听写任务的准确性(可懂性)和感知难度的评分(理解性)来衡量显性发音教学(PI)对初学 L2 西班牙语学习者(n = 116)听力理解能力的影响。学习者要么接受以分段音为重点的 PI,要么接受以超分段音为重点的 PI,然后练习发出或感知这些相同的声音。最初的文章报告说,随着时间的推移,包括对照组在内的所有组别都得到了提高,但超音段 PI 后以感知为重点的练习对可懂度的影响最大,而分段 PI 后以发音为重点的练习对可懂度的影响最大,这表明所有的教学方法都有价值。本报告更详细地解释了 Kissling(2018)所做的教学决定,包括招募的班级、教材编写和 PI 演示。