Evaluation of the Biological Response to Acetylsalicylic Acid by Platelet Occlusion Time in Pregnant Women in Brazzaville

LT Ocko Gokaba, JA Elira Samba, OF Galiba Atipo-Tsiba, Grj Buambo, LO Ngolet, RC Iwandza, P. I. Amboulou, J. N. Mboumba, C. Bango, C. Itoua, A. E. Dokekias
{"title":"Evaluation of the Biological Response to Acetylsalicylic Acid by Platelet Occlusion Time in Pregnant Women in Brazzaville","authors":"LT Ocko Gokaba, JA Elira Samba, OF Galiba Atipo-Tsiba, Grj Buambo, LO Ngolet, RC Iwandza, P. I. Amboulou, J. N. Mboumba, C. Bango, C. Itoua, A. E. Dokekias","doi":"10.9734/ibrr/2024/v15i1331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) has been recommended for pregnant women since 2011 by the OMS to prevent thrombotic phenomena. Despite the variability of its clinical efficacy (resistance phenomena), its non-standardized biological monitoring can be performed using platelet occlusion time (POT). The aim of this study was to assess the response to ASA using POT. \nA multicenter, cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted in the obstetrics and gynaecology departments of six Brazzaville hospitals over a period of 09 months and included pregnant women on ASA 100 mg daily for at least 7 days. POT was measured using the INNOVANCE® PFA®-200 system. The variables studied were clinical (age, medical and obstetrical history) and biological (blood count, POT). Non-response to ASA was defined by a POT of 150 seconds or less. Data analysis was performed using STATA 12 software. Logistic regression was used to assess the determinants associated with non-response. The incidence of obstetric complications according to ASA resistance was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-Rank test. The significance threshold was p<0.005. \nThe study involved 39 pregnant women, mean age 33.9 ± 5.4 years, treated with ASA for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy n=19 (48.7%), chronic arterial hypertension n=7 (18%), diabetes n=3(7.7%) fetal death n=3(7.7%), unexplained miscarriage n=3(7.7%), advanced age n=2 (5.1%) and twin pregnancy n=2(5.1%). The median body index was 25.5 kg/m2 [23.7;29.4] with 35.9% women of normal weight, 48.7% overweight and 15.4% obese. Non-response to ASA was found in 12 pregnant women (30.7%). No statistically significant differences were observed between non-responders and responders with regard to epidemiological, clinical and haematological determinants (p>0.05). Non-response was more observed in women with complications 23.08% versus 7.7% (p=0,008). \nNon-response to ASA, present in a third of hypertensive pregnant women, is associated with the occurrence of obstetrical complications in Brazzaville.","PeriodicalId":249518,"journal":{"name":"International Blood Research &amp; Reviews","volume":"75 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Blood Research &amp; Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ibrr/2024/v15i1331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) has been recommended for pregnant women since 2011 by the OMS to prevent thrombotic phenomena. Despite the variability of its clinical efficacy (resistance phenomena), its non-standardized biological monitoring can be performed using platelet occlusion time (POT). The aim of this study was to assess the response to ASA using POT. A multicenter, cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted in the obstetrics and gynaecology departments of six Brazzaville hospitals over a period of 09 months and included pregnant women on ASA 100 mg daily for at least 7 days. POT was measured using the INNOVANCE® PFA®-200 system. The variables studied were clinical (age, medical and obstetrical history) and biological (blood count, POT). Non-response to ASA was defined by a POT of 150 seconds or less. Data analysis was performed using STATA 12 software. Logistic regression was used to assess the determinants associated with non-response. The incidence of obstetric complications according to ASA resistance was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-Rank test. The significance threshold was p<0.005. The study involved 39 pregnant women, mean age 33.9 ± 5.4 years, treated with ASA for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy n=19 (48.7%), chronic arterial hypertension n=7 (18%), diabetes n=3(7.7%) fetal death n=3(7.7%), unexplained miscarriage n=3(7.7%), advanced age n=2 (5.1%) and twin pregnancy n=2(5.1%). The median body index was 25.5 kg/m2 [23.7;29.4] with 35.9% women of normal weight, 48.7% overweight and 15.4% obese. Non-response to ASA was found in 12 pregnant women (30.7%). No statistically significant differences were observed between non-responders and responders with regard to epidemiological, clinical and haematological determinants (p>0.05). Non-response was more observed in women with complications 23.08% versus 7.7% (p=0,008). Non-response to ASA, present in a third of hypertensive pregnant women, is associated with the occurrence of obstetrical complications in Brazzaville.
通过血小板闭塞时间评估布拉柴维尔孕妇对乙酰水杨酸的生物反应
自 2011 年起,OMS 建议孕妇服用小剂量乙酰水杨酸(ASA)以预防血栓现象。尽管其临床疗效(耐药现象)存在变异,但可通过血小板闭塞时间(POT)对其进行非标准化的生物监测。本研究旨在使用 POT 评估对 ASA 的反应。这项多中心、横断面分析研究在布拉柴维尔六家医院的妇产科进行,为期 09 个月,研究对象包括每天服用 100 毫克 ASA 至少 7 天的孕妇。使用 INNOVANCE® PFA®-200 系统对 POT 进行了测量。研究变量包括临床变量(年龄、病史和产科史)和生物变量(血细胞计数、POT)。对 ASA 无应答的定义是 POT 为 150 秒或更短。数据分析使用 STATA 12 软件进行。逻辑回归用于评估与未响应相关的决定因素。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和 Log-Rank 检验评估了 ASA 耐受情况下产科并发症的发生率。显著性阈值为 p0.05)。出现并发症的产妇中,无应答率更高,分别为 23.08% 和 7.7%(P=0,008)。在布拉柴维尔,三分之一的高血压孕妇对 ASA 无反应,这与产科并发症的发生有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信