{"title":"On Illustrating Dostoevsky’s Works","authors":"E. V. Stepanian","doi":"10.51236/2618-7140-2023-6-3-36-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses several problematic aspects related to the illustration of F. M. Dostoevsky's literary works. Illustration in particular is one of the major ways to create an “artistic aura” surrounding a literary text. Owing to the visual interpretation of verbal imagery, a new associative layer and a possibility of reinterpretations of the text are able to emerge. The author argues that illustrating novels of one of the greatest Russian writers is a task of special complexity. First of all, this is due to the fact that Dostoevsky's literary portrait is based on different principles than his own. It is primarily linked to the fact that Dostoevsky's literary portrait is based on principles that differ from those of his contemporaries, such as Turgenev, Goncharov, and Tolstoy. External descriptiveness and detailed portrayal of the character retreat in the texts of Dostoevsky before the “energy of contradictions” inherent in the initial portrait of his heroes. As a result, the task of an artist illustrating novels by the Russian literary genius proves arduous: he must convey, first and foremost, the dynamics of personality formation of Raskolnikov, Myshkin, or Dmitri Karamazov, rather than stable recognizability and their physiological individuality. This perspective is applied in order to analyze the work of a variety of prominent illustrators in the light of Dostoevsky's ideas and anthropology. The author of the present study reveals the discrepancies between the writer's world and the embodiment of the characters' images in the illustration. Likewise, he identifies the ways in which, from his point of view, the most striking matches between verbal and visual images appear possible.","PeriodicalId":499462,"journal":{"name":"Secreta artis","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secreta artis","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51236/2618-7140-2023-6-3-36-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article addresses several problematic aspects related to the illustration of F. M. Dostoevsky's literary works. Illustration in particular is one of the major ways to create an “artistic aura” surrounding a literary text. Owing to the visual interpretation of verbal imagery, a new associative layer and a possibility of reinterpretations of the text are able to emerge. The author argues that illustrating novels of one of the greatest Russian writers is a task of special complexity. First of all, this is due to the fact that Dostoevsky's literary portrait is based on different principles than his own. It is primarily linked to the fact that Dostoevsky's literary portrait is based on principles that differ from those of his contemporaries, such as Turgenev, Goncharov, and Tolstoy. External descriptiveness and detailed portrayal of the character retreat in the texts of Dostoevsky before the “energy of contradictions” inherent in the initial portrait of his heroes. As a result, the task of an artist illustrating novels by the Russian literary genius proves arduous: he must convey, first and foremost, the dynamics of personality formation of Raskolnikov, Myshkin, or Dmitri Karamazov, rather than stable recognizability and their physiological individuality. This perspective is applied in order to analyze the work of a variety of prominent illustrators in the light of Dostoevsky's ideas and anthropology. The author of the present study reveals the discrepancies between the writer's world and the embodiment of the characters' images in the illustration. Likewise, he identifies the ways in which, from his point of view, the most striking matches between verbal and visual images appear possible.
文章探讨了与 F. M. 陀思妥耶夫斯基文学作品插图有关的几个问题。插图尤其是为文学文本营造 "艺术光环 "的主要方式之一。通过对语言意象的视觉诠释,可以产生新的联想层,并有可能对文本进行重新诠释。作者认为,为俄罗斯最伟大的作家之一的小说绘制插图是一项特别复杂的任务。首先,这是由于陀思妥耶夫斯基的文学肖像所依据的原则与他自己的原则不同。这主要与陀思妥耶夫斯基的文学肖像所依据的原则不同于他同时代的作家,如屠格涅夫、冈察洛夫和托尔斯泰有关。在陀思妥耶夫斯基的文本中,人物的外在描写和细节刻画在他对英雄的最初描绘所固有的 "矛盾能量 "面前退却了。因此,为这位俄罗斯文学天才的小说绘制插图的艺术家的任务是艰巨的:他必须首先传达拉斯柯尔尼科夫、迈什金或德米特里-卡拉马佐夫的人格形成的动力,而不是稳定的可识别性和他们的生理个性。本研究运用这一视角,从陀思妥耶夫斯基的思想和人类学角度分析了多位著名插图画家的作品。本研究的作者揭示了作家的世界与插图中人物形象的体现之间的差异。同样,他还指出了从他的角度来看,语言形象和视觉形象之间可能出现的最引人注目的匹配方式。