Comparative study: Garlic, ginger and turmeric as natural antimicrobials and bioactives

IF 1.5 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
K. A. Oyinlola, G. E. Ogunleye, Augustina I. Balogun, O. Joseph
{"title":"Comparative study: Garlic, ginger and turmeric as natural antimicrobials and bioactives","authors":"K. A. Oyinlola, G. E. Ogunleye, Augustina I. Balogun, O. Joseph","doi":"10.17159/sajs.2024/14170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biologically active compounds in most spices possess antimicrobial and other important biomedical properties. There have been huge demands for natural immunity boosters (spices and herbs), considering the recent global pandemic and challenges relating to drug-resistant pathogens. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of ginger, garlic and turmeric spices against some pathogenic microorganisms. Aqueous extraction of spices, antimicrobial sensitivity and minimum inhibitory concentration tests were done using standard microbiological methods. Bioactive compounds were estimated using the gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method. Aqueous extracts of ginger inhibited the growth of all test isolates except Streptococcus pneumoniae, with inhibition zones ranging between 0.9 mm and 13.5 mm. Escherichia coli, S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were resistant to turmeric extracts, while the extract of garlic inhibited only four of the test pathogens. Inhibition zones for turmeric ranged between 4.4 mm and 10.9 mm, while those for garlic were between 4.7 mm and 11.5 mm. All the spice extracts did not inhibit microbial growth at 10–40%. An antibiotic spectrum indicated that Bacillus sp. was resistant to all but one, nitrofurantoin, which also inhibited the growth of almost all pathogens, except H. influenzae, with zones ranging between 10.5 mm and 11.6 mm. All test pathogens were resistant to cloxacillin except E. coli (10.6 mm). The major phyto-active compounds present in ginger are 2-Butanone,4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl), 1,3-Cyclohexadiene and 1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl).","PeriodicalId":21928,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2024/14170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biologically active compounds in most spices possess antimicrobial and other important biomedical properties. There have been huge demands for natural immunity boosters (spices and herbs), considering the recent global pandemic and challenges relating to drug-resistant pathogens. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of ginger, garlic and turmeric spices against some pathogenic microorganisms. Aqueous extraction of spices, antimicrobial sensitivity and minimum inhibitory concentration tests were done using standard microbiological methods. Bioactive compounds were estimated using the gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method. Aqueous extracts of ginger inhibited the growth of all test isolates except Streptococcus pneumoniae, with inhibition zones ranging between 0.9 mm and 13.5 mm. Escherichia coli, S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were resistant to turmeric extracts, while the extract of garlic inhibited only four of the test pathogens. Inhibition zones for turmeric ranged between 4.4 mm and 10.9 mm, while those for garlic were between 4.7 mm and 11.5 mm. All the spice extracts did not inhibit microbial growth at 10–40%. An antibiotic spectrum indicated that Bacillus sp. was resistant to all but one, nitrofurantoin, which also inhibited the growth of almost all pathogens, except H. influenzae, with zones ranging between 10.5 mm and 11.6 mm. All test pathogens were resistant to cloxacillin except E. coli (10.6 mm). The major phyto-active compounds present in ginger are 2-Butanone,4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl), 1,3-Cyclohexadiene and 1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl).
比较研究:作为天然抗菌剂和生物活性物质的大蒜、生姜和姜黄
大多数香料中的生物活性化合物都具有抗菌和其他重要的生物医学特性。考虑到最近的全球流行病和与耐药性病原体有关的挑战,对天然免疫增强剂(香料和草药)的需求量巨大。本研究旨在比较生姜、大蒜和姜黄等香料对一些病原微生物的功效。采用标准微生物学方法对香料进行了水提取、抗菌敏感性和最小抑菌浓度测试。生物活性化合物采用气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)进行估算。生姜水提取物可抑制除肺炎链球菌以外的所有测试分离物的生长,抑菌区在 0.9 毫米至 13.5 毫米之间。大肠杆菌、肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌对姜黄提取物具有抗药性,而大蒜提取物只能抑制四种病原体的生长。姜黄的抑制区在 4.4 毫米到 10.9 毫米之间,而大蒜的抑制区在 4.7 毫米到 11.5 毫米之间。所有香料提取物对微生物生长的抑制率在 10-40% 之间。抗生素谱显示,除硝基呋喃妥因外,芽孢杆菌对其他所有抗生素都有抗药性,而硝基呋喃妥因也能抑制几乎所有病原体的生长,但流感嗜血杆菌除外,其抑制区在 10.5 毫米到 11.6 毫米之间。除大肠杆菌(10.6 毫米)外,所有测试病原体都对氯唑西林有抗药性。生姜中的主要植物活性化合物是 2-丁酮、4-(4-羟基-3-甲氧基苯基)、1,3-环己二烯和 1-(4-羟基-3-甲氧基苯基)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Journal of Science
South African Journal of Science 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Science is a multidisciplinary journal published bimonthly by the Academy of Science of South Africa. Our mandate is to publish original research with an interdisciplinary or regional focus, which will interest readers from more than one discipline, and to provide a forum for discussion of news and developments in research and higher education. Authors are requested to write their papers and reports in a manner and style that is intelligible to specialists and non-specialists alike. Research contributions, which are peer reviewed, are of three kinds: Review Articles, Research Articles and Research Letters.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信