John Patrick G. Jacinto, Reymond Galvez, C. Salonga
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of English Language Proficiency in Business vs. Technology/Engineering Students","authors":"John Patrick G. Jacinto, Reymond Galvez, C. Salonga","doi":"10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates English language proficiency among students in Business and Technology/Engineering programs. It aims to understand which discipline exhibits higher English proficiency and to explore the differences in language skills between these fields. The research employs descriptive and inferential statistical methods, including the Mann-Whitney U test, to analyze students’ English language proficiency scores in listening and reading. Results indicate that students in Technology/Engineering programs generally outperform those in Business programs in both listening and reading proficiency. The study finds significant disparities within each field; for example, in Business programs, students majoring in Marketing Management show much higher proficiency than those in Accountancy. Similarly, within Technology/Engineering, Civil Engineering students demonstrate higher language proficiency compared to their peers in Information Technology. The study concludes that there is a statistically significant difference in English language proficiency between students in Business and Technology/Engineering programs, with the latter group showing higher overall proficiency. This research provides valuable insights for educators and curriculum developers, suggesting the need for tailored English language support and teaching methods in different academic disciplines.","PeriodicalId":151974,"journal":{"name":"Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i01.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates English language proficiency among students in Business and Technology/Engineering programs. It aims to understand which discipline exhibits higher English proficiency and to explore the differences in language skills between these fields. The research employs descriptive and inferential statistical methods, including the Mann-Whitney U test, to analyze students’ English language proficiency scores in listening and reading. Results indicate that students in Technology/Engineering programs generally outperform those in Business programs in both listening and reading proficiency. The study finds significant disparities within each field; for example, in Business programs, students majoring in Marketing Management show much higher proficiency than those in Accountancy. Similarly, within Technology/Engineering, Civil Engineering students demonstrate higher language proficiency compared to their peers in Information Technology. The study concludes that there is a statistically significant difference in English language proficiency between students in Business and Technology/Engineering programs, with the latter group showing higher overall proficiency. This research provides valuable insights for educators and curriculum developers, suggesting the need for tailored English language support and teaching methods in different academic disciplines.
本研究调查了商业和技术/工程专业学生的英语水平。研究旨在了解哪个学科的学生英语水平较高,并探讨这两个学科在语言技能方面的差异。研究采用了描述性和推论性统计方法,包括曼-惠特尼 U 检验,来分析学生在听力和阅读方面的英语水平得分。结果表明,技术/工程专业的学生在听力和阅读能力方面普遍优于商科专业的学生。研究发现,每个专业内部都存在明显的差异;例如,在商科专业中,市场营销管理专业的学生比会计专业的学生表现出更高的水平。同样,在技术/工程专业中,土木工程专业学生的语言能力高于信息技术专业学生。研究得出结论,商科和技术/工程专业的学生在英语熟练程度上存在显著的统计学差异,后者显示出更高的整体熟练程度。这项研究为教育工作者和课程开发人员提供了宝贵的见解,表明不同学科需要有针对性的英语语言支持和教学方法。