Whole breast ultrafractionation radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in early breast cancer: A single-center, prospective, observational study from China

Rui-Zhi Zhao, Cheng Huang, Tian-Lan Tang, Gui-Qing Shi, Si-Lin Chen, Yu-Ping Lin, Ying Wang, Liu-Qing Jiang, Jin-Hua Chen, Chun-Sen Xu, Fang-Meng Fu, Zhong-Hua Han, Shun-Guo Lin, Chuan Wang, Yong Yang
{"title":"Whole breast ultrafractionation radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in early breast cancer: A single-center, prospective, observational study from China","authors":"Rui-Zhi Zhao,&nbsp;Cheng Huang,&nbsp;Tian-Lan Tang,&nbsp;Gui-Qing Shi,&nbsp;Si-Lin Chen,&nbsp;Yu-Ping Lin,&nbsp;Ying Wang,&nbsp;Liu-Qing Jiang,&nbsp;Jin-Hua Chen,&nbsp;Chun-Sen Xu,&nbsp;Fang-Meng Fu,&nbsp;Zhong-Hua Han,&nbsp;Shun-Guo Lin,&nbsp;Chuan Wang,&nbsp;Yong Yang","doi":"10.1002/msp2.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center, prospective, observational study was designed to investigate the toxicities, patient-reported outcome (PRO), and dosimetric analysis of whole breast ultrafractionation radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in early breast cancer (BC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients diagnosed with BC stage I, II and treated with BCS were enrolled. A dose of 26 Gray (Gy) in five fractions was prescribed to the whole breast and tumor bed. Clinical endpoints included toxicities, PRO, and dosimetric analysis. PRO was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer general quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the BC-specific questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23) questionnaires.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between January 2022 and June 2023, 62 female patients were enrolled. The median age was 45 years. Most patients (83.9%) were diagnosed with pathological stage I disease. The median planning target volume (PTV) was 456.4 mL. The minimum, maximum, and mean doses, and D<sub>95</sub> (dose of PTV irradiated volume more than 95%) to PTV were 20.2, 28.8, 27.2, and 26.3 Gy, respectively. The median mean lung dose and percentage lung volume receiving 8 Gy (V<sub>8</sub>) were 3.6 Gy and 13.4%, respectively. The median mean heart dose, V<sub>1.5</sub> (percentage of organ volume irradiated with 1.5 Gy or higher), and V<sub>7</sub> (percentage of organ volume irradiated with 7 Gy or higher) were 0.6 Gy, 6.8%, and 0.4%, respectively. Cosmetic effects before RT showed no obvious differences compared to that post RT. No toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred. Five patients had asymptomatic radiation pneumonia (grade 1), and 12 patients had radiation dermatitis (grade 1). No factor was significantly related to radiation dermatitis or radiation pneumonia. For the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires, all function and symptom scores before RT had no significant differences compared with that after RT, 1−2 months after RT, and 3−4 months after RT. Ultrafractionation RT did not worsen PRO. The 1-year crude local control was 100%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Whole breast ultrafractionation RT after BCS in early BC has no severe toxicities and does not affect PRO. These results need to be further validated with a longer follow-up and a larger sample size.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100882,"journal":{"name":"Malignancy Spectrum","volume":"1 2","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/msp2.21","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malignancy Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/msp2.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This single-center, prospective, observational study was designed to investigate the toxicities, patient-reported outcome (PRO), and dosimetric analysis of whole breast ultrafractionation radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in early breast cancer (BC).

Patients and methods

Patients diagnosed with BC stage I, II and treated with BCS were enrolled. A dose of 26 Gray (Gy) in five fractions was prescribed to the whole breast and tumor bed. Clinical endpoints included toxicities, PRO, and dosimetric analysis. PRO was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer general quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the BC-specific questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23) questionnaires.

Results

Between January 2022 and June 2023, 62 female patients were enrolled. The median age was 45 years. Most patients (83.9%) were diagnosed with pathological stage I disease. The median planning target volume (PTV) was 456.4 mL. The minimum, maximum, and mean doses, and D95 (dose of PTV irradiated volume more than 95%) to PTV were 20.2, 28.8, 27.2, and 26.3 Gy, respectively. The median mean lung dose and percentage lung volume receiving 8 Gy (V8) were 3.6 Gy and 13.4%, respectively. The median mean heart dose, V1.5 (percentage of organ volume irradiated with 1.5 Gy or higher), and V7 (percentage of organ volume irradiated with 7 Gy or higher) were 0.6 Gy, 6.8%, and 0.4%, respectively. Cosmetic effects before RT showed no obvious differences compared to that post RT. No toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred. Five patients had asymptomatic radiation pneumonia (grade 1), and 12 patients had radiation dermatitis (grade 1). No factor was significantly related to radiation dermatitis or radiation pneumonia. For the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires, all function and symptom scores before RT had no significant differences compared with that after RT, 1−2 months after RT, and 3−4 months after RT. Ultrafractionation RT did not worsen PRO. The 1-year crude local control was 100%.

Conclusion

Whole breast ultrafractionation RT after BCS in early BC has no severe toxicities and does not affect PRO. These results need to be further validated with a longer follow-up and a larger sample size.

Abstract Image

早期乳腺癌保乳手术后的全乳超分割放疗:中国单中心前瞻性观察研究
这项单中心、前瞻性、观察性研究旨在调查早期乳腺癌(BC)保乳手术(BCS)后全乳超分割放疗(RT)的毒性、患者报告结果(PRO)和剂量学分析。对整个乳房和肿瘤床的放疗剂量为26格雷(Gy),分5次进行。临床终点包括毒性、PRO和剂量分析。PRO通过欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织一般生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)和BC特异性问卷(EORTC QLQ-BR23)进行测量。中位年龄为 45 岁。大多数患者(83.9%)被诊断为病理 I 期。规划靶体积(PTV)的中位数为456.4毫升。PTV的最小、最大和平均剂量以及D95(PTV照射体积超过95%的剂量)分别为20.2、28.8、27.2和26.3 Gy。中位平均肺剂量和接受8 Gy(V8)的肺容积百分比分别为3.6 Gy和13.4%。心脏平均剂量中位数、V1.5(接受1.5 Gy或更高剂量照射的器官体积百分比)和V7(接受7 Gy或更高剂量照射的器官体积百分比)分别为0.6 Gy、6.8%和0.4%。RT前的美容效果与RT后相比无明显差异。没有出现 3 级或以上的毒性反应。5名患者出现无症状放射性肺炎(1级),12名患者出现放射性皮炎(1级)。没有任何因素与放射性皮炎或放射性肺炎有明显关系。在EORTC QLQ-C30和QLQ-BR23问卷中,RT前的所有功能和症状评分与RT后、RT后1-2个月和RT后3-4个月的评分相比均无明显差异。超分割 RT 并未恶化 PRO。BCS治疗早期乳腺癌后进行全乳超分割RT不会产生严重毒性反应,也不会影响患者的预后。这些结果需要更长时间的随访和更大样本量的进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信