Decoding Sentiments: Exploring Islamic Fintech Discourse on Twitter in the Post-Pandemic

Abdullah Haidar
{"title":"Decoding Sentiments: Exploring Islamic Fintech Discourse on Twitter in the Post-Pandemic","authors":"Abdullah Haidar","doi":"10.56174/pjieb.v4i1.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twitter users' perceptions of sharia-compliant fintech offer a revealing insight into their responses to Islamic financial innovations. Analyzing 2,131 tweets, the study found that the majority of attitudes were neutral (80.8%), followed by positive sentiments (16.2%), and negativity was the least (3%). This paints an intriguing picture of user reactions toward sharia fintech. The prevalence of neutral attitudes suggests a lack of full engagement or a neutral stance among users, potentially due to limited understanding or minimal interaction with Islamic finance platforms. However, the significant positive sentiment indicates an interest and endorsement of sharia-compliant finance, seen as an ethical and aligned alternative within Islamic principles. Conversely, the emergence of negative sentiment raises concerns regarding compatibility with genuine sharia principles and the safety of its implementation. Addressing these concerns through education and transparency becomes crucial. A comprehensive approach involving regulation, outreach, and risk management is essential to build trust and understanding of the value sharia fintech offers in the modern financial landscape. \n ","PeriodicalId":471606,"journal":{"name":"Perbanas Journal of Islamic Economics and Business","volume":"211 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perbanas Journal of Islamic Economics and Business","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56174/pjieb.v4i1.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twitter users' perceptions of sharia-compliant fintech offer a revealing insight into their responses to Islamic financial innovations. Analyzing 2,131 tweets, the study found that the majority of attitudes were neutral (80.8%), followed by positive sentiments (16.2%), and negativity was the least (3%). This paints an intriguing picture of user reactions toward sharia fintech. The prevalence of neutral attitudes suggests a lack of full engagement or a neutral stance among users, potentially due to limited understanding or minimal interaction with Islamic finance platforms. However, the significant positive sentiment indicates an interest and endorsement of sharia-compliant finance, seen as an ethical and aligned alternative within Islamic principles. Conversely, the emergence of negative sentiment raises concerns regarding compatibility with genuine sharia principles and the safety of its implementation. Addressing these concerns through education and transparency becomes crucial. A comprehensive approach involving regulation, outreach, and risk management is essential to build trust and understanding of the value sharia fintech offers in the modern financial landscape.  
解码情绪:探索大流行后推特上的伊斯兰金融科技言论
推特用户对符合伊斯兰教法的金融技术的看法揭示了他们对伊斯兰金融创新的反应。通过分析 2,131 条推文,研究发现大多数人的态度是中立的(80.8%),其次是积极的(16.2%),消极的最少(3%)。这为用户对伊斯兰教金融科技的反应描绘了一幅耐人寻味的图景。中立态度的普遍存在表明用户缺乏充分参与或持中立立场,这可能是由于对伊斯兰金融平台的了解有限或互动极少。然而,显著的积极情绪表明了人们对符合伊斯兰教法的金融的兴趣和认可,认为它是符合伊斯兰教法原则的一种合乎道德的选择。反之,负面情绪的出现则引发了对是否符合真正的伊斯兰教法原则及其实施安全性的担忧。通过教育和提高透明度来解决这些问题变得至关重要。一个涉及监管、外联和风险管理的综合方法对于建立信任和理解伊斯兰教金融科技在现代金融领域提供的价值至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信