Perception of Engineering Students on Social Constructivist Learning Approach in Classroom

Thi Cam Thuy Ngo
{"title":"Perception of Engineering Students on Social Constructivist Learning Approach in Classroom","authors":"Thi Cam Thuy Ngo","doi":"10.3991/ijep.v14i1.43101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social constructivist approach to teaching and learning has garnered significant interest among educators and researchers. However, further investigation into its implementation and effectiveness in the classroom is still needed. This study aims to investigate engineering students’ perceptions of social constructivist practices in their technology classes, using the constructivist learning environment survey (CLES) as its framework. A mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative methods was used, which included online surveys and semi-structured interviews. Analysis of data from 300 responses showed that constructivism was partially implemented in the classroom. Specifically, student negotiation emerged as the most frequently perceived dimension, while shared control was perceived as seldom occurring. Most items on the personal relevance scale were frequently perceived, highlighting the importance of integrating technology learning into students’ daily lives. Similarly, the uncertainty of technology was found to be a common experience for students. In contrast, the dimension of critical voice received mixed results, emphasizing the necessity of a learning environment that fosters student expression and meaningful discussions. These findings suggest the necessity for additional investigation and integration of social constructivist practices that emphasize the enhancement of student engagement, promotion of critical thinking, and redistribution of power within the classroom setting.","PeriodicalId":170699,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Eng. Pedagog.","volume":"190 3","pages":"20-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Eng. Pedagog.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i1.43101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The social constructivist approach to teaching and learning has garnered significant interest among educators and researchers. However, further investigation into its implementation and effectiveness in the classroom is still needed. This study aims to investigate engineering students’ perceptions of social constructivist practices in their technology classes, using the constructivist learning environment survey (CLES) as its framework. A mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative methods was used, which included online surveys and semi-structured interviews. Analysis of data from 300 responses showed that constructivism was partially implemented in the classroom. Specifically, student negotiation emerged as the most frequently perceived dimension, while shared control was perceived as seldom occurring. Most items on the personal relevance scale were frequently perceived, highlighting the importance of integrating technology learning into students’ daily lives. Similarly, the uncertainty of technology was found to be a common experience for students. In contrast, the dimension of critical voice received mixed results, emphasizing the necessity of a learning environment that fosters student expression and meaningful discussions. These findings suggest the necessity for additional investigation and integration of social constructivist practices that emphasize the enhancement of student engagement, promotion of critical thinking, and redistribution of power within the classroom setting.
工科学生对社会建构主义课堂学习方法的看法
社会建构主义教学法已引起教育工作者和研究人员的极大兴趣。然而,对其在课堂上的实施和效果仍需进一步调查。本研究以建构主义学习环境调查(CLES)为框架,旨在调查工科学生在技术课上对社会建构主义实践的看法。研究采用了定量和定性相结合的混合方法,包括在线调查和半结构化访谈。对 300 份答复的数据分析显示,建构主义在课堂上得到了部分实施。具体来说,学生协商是最常被认为的维度,而共同控制被认为很少发生。个人相关性量表中的大多数项目都被频繁提及,这凸显了将技术学习融入学生日常生活的重要性。同样,技术的不确定性也是学生的共同体验。相比之下,批判性发言权的维度得到的结果好坏参半,强调了促进学生表达和有意义讨论的学习环境的必要性。这些发现表明,有必要对社会建构主义实践进行更多的调查和整合,强调提高学生的参与度、促进批判性思维以及在课堂环境中重新分配权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信