Military Incursion into Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Civil-Military Relationship in Pakistan and Nigeria

Integration: Journal Of Social Sciences And Culture Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.38142/ijssc.v1i3.149

Ismail Adaramola Abdul Azeez

{"title":"Military Incursion into Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Civil-Military Relationship in Pakistan and Nigeria","authors":"Ismail Adaramola Abdul Azeez","doi":"10.38142/ijssc.v1i3.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:Objective number one in the current study seeks to understand the role of historical developments in shaping the direction of democracy with a testable hypothesis one having that the Military intervention in politics is a result of bad politics exercised by politicians while addressing problems caused by low political culture, this paper explores answers to that question in a context of renewed option rule in Pakistan and Nigeria.Methodology:This Research paper will provide an overview of the major historical events since the independence of these two countries to be in a position to evaluate the role of the military in politics. The Nigerian military's poor human rights record has had a devastating impact on its effectiveness.Findings:Severe abuse of civilian communities, from the Ogoni (in the mid-1990s) to Odi (1999) and Zaki Biam (2001), and more recent extrajudicial assassinations, frequently in the background of contradicting militant and separatist groups from Boko Haram and the Islamic.Implication:Movement of Nigeria (IMN) In recent days, Pakistan has had legitimate power to encompass the tenures of the chiefs of staff of the army, navy, and air force.","PeriodicalId":269809,"journal":{"name":"Integration: Journal Of Social Sciences And Culture","volume":"622 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integration: Journal Of Social Sciences And Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38142/ijssc.v1i3.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:Objective number one in the current study seeks to understand the role of historical developments in shaping the direction of democracy with a testable hypothesis one having that the Military intervention in politics is a result of bad politics exercised by politicians while addressing problems caused by low political culture, this paper explores answers to that question in a context of renewed option rule in Pakistan and Nigeria.Methodology:This Research paper will provide an overview of the major historical events since the independence of these two countries to be in a position to evaluate the role of the military in politics. The Nigerian military's poor human rights record has had a devastating impact on its effectiveness.Findings:Severe abuse of civilian communities, from the Ogoni (in the mid-1990s) to Odi (1999) and Zaki Biam (2001), and more recent extrajudicial assassinations, frequently in the background of contradicting militant and separatist groups from Boko Haram and the Islamic.Implication:Movement of Nigeria (IMN) In recent days, Pakistan has had legitimate power to encompass the tenures of the chiefs of staff of the army, navy, and air force.

查看原文本刊更多论文

军事介入政治：巴基斯坦和尼日利亚军民关系的比较分析

目的：本研究的第一项目标是了解历史发展在塑造民主方向中的作用，并提出一个可检验的假设，即军方干预政治是政治家实施不良政治的结果，同时解决低政治文化造成的问题，本文将在巴基斯坦和尼日利亚重新选择统治的背景下探讨这一问题的答案。方法：本研究论文将概述这两个国家独立以来的重大历史事件，以便评估军方在政治中的作用。研究结果：从奥戈尼人（20 世纪 90 年代中期）到奥迪人（1999 年）和扎基-比亚姆人（2001 年），以及最近的法外暗杀事件都严重侵犯了平民的人权。影响：尼日利亚运动（IMN）最近几天，巴基斯坦拥有合法的权力，包括陆军、海军和空军参谋长的任期。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Integration: Journal Of Social Sciences And Culture

自引率

0.00%

发文量