The Mariana Trench of transphobia in South Africa: The legislative lacunae in KOS v Minister of Home Affairs

Q3 Social Sciences
Sophy Baird
{"title":"The Mariana Trench of transphobia in South Africa: The legislative lacunae in KOS v Minister of Home Affairs","authors":"Sophy Baird","doi":"10.17159/1996-2096/2023/v23n2a8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Society as a whole has for eons been premised on the importance of patriarchy and heteronormatity. During this time society has seen gradual leaps regarding people in the LGBTQI+ community. South Africa appears to be at the foreground of this recognition of the rights of people in this marginalised grouping. However, what may be present on paper may not appear to be what it is. This case discussion examines the extent to which, among others, the Alteration of Sex Description and Sex Status Act as well as the Marriage Act fail to address the matters ancillary to transgender individuals and the glaring discrimination faced by the transgender community in the face of a country that prides itself in a sense of equality that unfortunately is not enjoyed by all its people. To illustrate this point, it is important to examine the above-mentioned Acts in conjunction with KOS v Minister of Home Affairs. There appears to also be a glaring deficit in the fundamental understanding between sex and gender within the legislation and a need to update the legislation to the contemporary shift in the issues faced by the LGBTQI+ community.","PeriodicalId":36136,"journal":{"name":"African Human Rights Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Human Rights Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2023/v23n2a8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Society as a whole has for eons been premised on the importance of patriarchy and heteronormatity. During this time society has seen gradual leaps regarding people in the LGBTQI+ community. South Africa appears to be at the foreground of this recognition of the rights of people in this marginalised grouping. However, what may be present on paper may not appear to be what it is. This case discussion examines the extent to which, among others, the Alteration of Sex Description and Sex Status Act as well as the Marriage Act fail to address the matters ancillary to transgender individuals and the glaring discrimination faced by the transgender community in the face of a country that prides itself in a sense of equality that unfortunately is not enjoyed by all its people. To illustrate this point, it is important to examine the above-mentioned Acts in conjunction with KOS v Minister of Home Affairs. There appears to also be a glaring deficit in the fundamental understanding between sex and gender within the legislation and a need to update the legislation to the contemporary shift in the issues faced by the LGBTQI+ community.
南非变性恐惧症的马里亚纳海沟:KOS 诉内政部长案中的立法空白
长久以来,整个社会都以父权制和异性恋的重要性为前提。在此期间,社会对男女同性恋、双性恋、变性者和跨性别者(LGBTQI+)群体的关注逐步提高。在承认这一边缘群体的权利方面,南非似乎走在了前列。然而,纸上得来终觉浅,绝知此事要躬行。本案例讨论探讨了《更改性别描述和性别地位法》以及《婚姻法》等法律在多大程度上未能解决变性人的相关问题,以及变性人群体在这个以平等意识为荣的国家所面临的明显歧视,遗憾的是,并非所有的人都能享受到这种平等。为了说明这一点,有必要结合 KOS 诉内政部长一案来研究上述法案。在立法中,对性和性别的基本理解似乎也存在明显不足,有必要更新立法,以适应 LGBTQI+ 群体所面临问题的当代变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Human Rights Law Journal
African Human Rights Law Journal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信