Corporate governance report compliance rate and accounting conservatism: New evidence from Korea

Hyoung Seok Choo, Sun-ae Cho, Jeongeun Emilia Lee
{"title":"Corporate governance report compliance rate and accounting conservatism: New evidence from Korea","authors":"Hyoung Seok Choo, Sun-ae Cho, Jeongeun Emilia Lee","doi":"10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the relationship between the corporate governance report (CGR) compliance rate and a company’s accounting conservatism, utilizing the CGR compliance rate as a novel method to evaluate the effectiveness of corporate governance practices. Given the challenges of applying global indices to measure corporate governance in the Korean market, this study focuses on the CGR compliance rate as a key indicator. Utilizing the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model, specifically the Ball and Shivakumar (2005) model widely employed in previous studies to assess accounting conservatism, this paper conducts empirical analyses based on 784 observations from Korean listed firms between 2018 and 2021. The main analysis reveals a positive association between the CGR compliance rates (coef = –2.416, p-value < 0.01) and accounting conservatism. A fixed-effect model and a propensity score matching (PSM) model also show a positive association between the CGR compliance rates, respectively (coef = –2.507, p-value < 0.01; coef = –3.118, p-value < 0.1) and accounting conservatism. This study proves that firms with high CGR compliance rates tend to promptly recognize financial losses in financial reporting, thereby safeguarding investors. This suggests that investors should consider the CGR compliance rates when evaluating potential investments. Overall, these findings contribute to validating the CGR compliance rates as a valuable proxy for assessing corporate governance practices in Korean firms.","PeriodicalId":507796,"journal":{"name":"Investment Management and Financial Innovations","volume":"527 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Management and Financial Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between the corporate governance report (CGR) compliance rate and a company’s accounting conservatism, utilizing the CGR compliance rate as a novel method to evaluate the effectiveness of corporate governance practices. Given the challenges of applying global indices to measure corporate governance in the Korean market, this study focuses on the CGR compliance rate as a key indicator. Utilizing the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model, specifically the Ball and Shivakumar (2005) model widely employed in previous studies to assess accounting conservatism, this paper conducts empirical analyses based on 784 observations from Korean listed firms between 2018 and 2021. The main analysis reveals a positive association between the CGR compliance rates (coef = –2.416, p-value < 0.01) and accounting conservatism. A fixed-effect model and a propensity score matching (PSM) model also show a positive association between the CGR compliance rates, respectively (coef = –2.507, p-value < 0.01; coef = –3.118, p-value < 0.1) and accounting conservatism. This study proves that firms with high CGR compliance rates tend to promptly recognize financial losses in financial reporting, thereby safeguarding investors. This suggests that investors should consider the CGR compliance rates when evaluating potential investments. Overall, these findings contribute to validating the CGR compliance rates as a valuable proxy for assessing corporate governance practices in Korean firms.
公司治理报告合规率与会计保守主义:韩国的新证据
本研究探讨了公司治理报告(CGR)合规率与公司会计保守主义之间的关系,将公司治理报告合规率作为评估公司治理实践有效性的一种新方法。鉴于在韩国市场应用全球指数衡量公司治理所面临的挑战,本研究将重点放在作为关键指标的 CGR 达标率上。本文利用普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归模型,特别是以往研究中广泛用于评估会计保守主义的 Ball 和 Shivakumar(2005)模型,基于 2018 年至 2021 年期间韩国上市公司的 784 个观测值进行了实证分析。主要分析显示,CGR合规率(coef = -2.416,p值< 0.01)与会计保守主义之间存在正相关。固定效应模型和倾向得分匹配(PSM)模型也分别显示了 CGR 合规率(coef = -2.507,p 值为 0.01;coef = -3.118,p 值为 0.1)与会计保守主义之间的正相关关系。本研究证明,CGR 合规率高的公司往往会在财务报告中及时确认财务损失,从而保护投资者的利益。这表明,投资者在评估潜在投资时应考虑 CGR 合规率。总之,这些研究结果有助于验证 CGR 合规率是评估韩国企业公司治理实践的一个有价值的替代指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信