Clinical Inertia in Terms of Recurrent Hospitalization in the Treatment of Heart Failure Between General Physicians and Cardiologists

Kaleem Ullah Shaikh, Abeer Sarfaraz, S. Sarfaraz, Muhammad Wasiq Anwar, Falaknaz Salari, Faryal Fatima
{"title":"Clinical Inertia in Terms of Recurrent Hospitalization in the Treatment of Heart Failure Between General Physicians and Cardiologists","authors":"Kaleem Ullah Shaikh, Abeer Sarfaraz, S. Sarfaraz, Muhammad Wasiq Anwar, Falaknaz Salari, Faryal Fatima","doi":"10.54393/pbmj.v7i01.1025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiologists are more likely to use clinical guideline-supported therapies than general physicians, a fact that has been shown to reduce readmissions. Objective: To compare the intensification of heart failure treatment and its course with re-hospitalization among general physicians and cardiologists at a tertiary care hospital. Methodology: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the cardiology inpatient department of a tertiary care hospital from June 2023 to December 2023 for six months. All patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were included. The treatment prescriptions that they had been followed before the event were noted along with the fact that whether they were treated by a cardiologist or a general physician, and their compliance with medical treatment was recorded. Frequencies and percentages were computed for qualitative variables. Results: A statistically significant association of re-admission was observed among cardiologists (1.40 ± 0.57) compared to general physicians (2.54 ± 0.57; p<0.001). Almost 100% of cardiologists advised beta blockers as compared to their prescription by 42% of general physicians. All cardiologists advised ARBS/ACE inhibitors as compared to 58% of general physicians. 90% of cardiologists advised aldosterone receptor antagonists as compared to 10% of general physicians. Only 12% of cardiologists advised SGLT-2 inhibitors as compared to 88% of physicians. Overall, 36% of cardiologists recommended guideline-mediated therapy while 12% of general physicians recommended guideline-mediated therapy. Conclusions: Cardiologist care is significantly associated with reduced re-admissions among patients re-admitted after heart failure treatment. ","PeriodicalId":19844,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan BioMedical Journal","volume":"64 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan BioMedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v7i01.1025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiologists are more likely to use clinical guideline-supported therapies than general physicians, a fact that has been shown to reduce readmissions. Objective: To compare the intensification of heart failure treatment and its course with re-hospitalization among general physicians and cardiologists at a tertiary care hospital. Methodology: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the cardiology inpatient department of a tertiary care hospital from June 2023 to December 2023 for six months. All patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were included. The treatment prescriptions that they had been followed before the event were noted along with the fact that whether they were treated by a cardiologist or a general physician, and their compliance with medical treatment was recorded. Frequencies and percentages were computed for qualitative variables. Results: A statistically significant association of re-admission was observed among cardiologists (1.40 ± 0.57) compared to general physicians (2.54 ± 0.57; p<0.001). Almost 100% of cardiologists advised beta blockers as compared to their prescription by 42% of general physicians. All cardiologists advised ARBS/ACE inhibitors as compared to 58% of general physicians. 90% of cardiologists advised aldosterone receptor antagonists as compared to 10% of general physicians. Only 12% of cardiologists advised SGLT-2 inhibitors as compared to 88% of physicians. Overall, 36% of cardiologists recommended guideline-mediated therapy while 12% of general physicians recommended guideline-mediated therapy. Conclusions: Cardiologist care is significantly associated with reduced re-admissions among patients re-admitted after heart failure treatment. 
全科医生和心脏病专家在治疗心力衰竭时反复住院的临床惯性
与普通医生相比,心脏病专家更倾向于使用临床指南支持的疗法,而事实证明这种疗法可以减少再住院率。目的比较一家三级医院的全科医生和心脏病专家对心衰治疗的强化程度及其与再住院的关系。研究方法:一项观察性横断面研究于 2023 年 6 月至 2023 年 12 月在一家三级医院的心脏病住院部进行,为期 6 个月。所有因射血分数降低的急性失代偿性心力衰竭入院的患者均被纳入研究范围。他们在事件发生前所遵循的治疗处方以及由心脏病专家还是普通医生治疗的事实都被记录在案,他们对医疗的依从性也被记录在案。对定性变量计算了频率和百分比。结果与普通内科医师(2.54 ± 0.57;P<0.001)相比,心脏病专家(1.40 ± 0.57)与再次入院有明显的统计学关联。几乎 100%的心脏病专家都建议使用β受体阻滞剂,而 42% 的普通内科医生则开出了此类处方。所有心脏病专家都建议使用 ARBS/ACE 抑制剂,而普通医生的比例为 58%。90% 的心脏病专家建议使用醛固酮受体拮抗剂,而普通医生的比例为 10%。只有 12% 的心脏病专家建议使用 SGLT-2 抑制剂,而医生的这一比例为 88%。总体而言,36% 的心脏病专家建议采用指导性疗法,而 12% 的普通内科医生建议采用指导性疗法。结论:心脏病专家的治疗与减少心衰治疗后再次入院患者的再次入院率有明显关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信