JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE CLAUSE OF WITHHOLDING THE ORIGINAL DIPLOMA OF WORKERS BY THE COMPANY IN THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Kadek Debi Triwangsa Mahardika, Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan
{"title":"JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE CLAUSE OF WITHHOLDING THE ORIGINAL DIPLOMA OF WORKERS BY THE COMPANY IN THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT","authors":"Kadek Debi Triwangsa Mahardika, Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan","doi":"10.55047/polri.v3i1.1060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to understand the aspects of legal certainty related to the Retention/Submission of Original Diplomas Clause in the employment contract applied by the Company and this research also aims to find out the legal protection efforts given to workers who agree to the retention of diploma clause in their employment contract, especially in the context where the Company is considered negligent in maintaining the original diploma belonging to its workers. The research method is normative legal research with an approach to legislation. The results of this study show that in the implementation of employment contracts that include diploma retention/submission clauses, there are no explicit statutory provisions that allow or prohibit the practice. However, regarding the legal requirements of agreements in employment contracts, this is regulated by the Civil Code. Therefore, the legal vacuum regarding whether or not the withholding of diplomas can cause this practice to occur as a result of customs in the world of work, and when related to RI Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights is contrary to the principles of human rights because it hampers workers' rights to get better jobs and improve their quality of life. In addition, in the legal protection efforts for workers who agree to the clause of withholding/submission of diplomas in their employment contracts, there are preventive and responsive legal protections. This shows that there are measures to prevent and respond to potential violations of workers' rights in the context of such clauses.","PeriodicalId":499977,"journal":{"name":"POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","volume":"388 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i1.1060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to understand the aspects of legal certainty related to the Retention/Submission of Original Diplomas Clause in the employment contract applied by the Company and this research also aims to find out the legal protection efforts given to workers who agree to the retention of diploma clause in their employment contract, especially in the context where the Company is considered negligent in maintaining the original diploma belonging to its workers. The research method is normative legal research with an approach to legislation. The results of this study show that in the implementation of employment contracts that include diploma retention/submission clauses, there are no explicit statutory provisions that allow or prohibit the practice. However, regarding the legal requirements of agreements in employment contracts, this is regulated by the Civil Code. Therefore, the legal vacuum regarding whether or not the withholding of diplomas can cause this practice to occur as a result of customs in the world of work, and when related to RI Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights is contrary to the principles of human rights because it hampers workers' rights to get better jobs and improve their quality of life. In addition, in the legal protection efforts for workers who agree to the clause of withholding/submission of diplomas in their employment contracts, there are preventive and responsive legal protections. This shows that there are measures to prevent and respond to potential violations of workers' rights in the context of such clauses.
对就业协议中公司扣留工人毕业证书原件条款的司法审查
本研究的目的是了解与公司适用的雇用合同中保留/提交原始文凭条款有关的法律确定性方面,本研究还旨在找出对同意在雇用合同中保留文凭条款的工人所给予的法律保护力度,特别是在公司被认为疏于维护属于其工人的原始文凭的情况下。研究方法是以立法为切入点的规范性法律研究。研究结果表明,在执行包含保留/提交文凭条款的雇用合同时,没有明确的法律规定允许或禁止这种做法。不过,关于雇用合同中协议的法律要求,《民法典》对此作了规定。因此,关于扣留文凭是否会造成这种做法的法律真空,是工作领域习俗的结果,如果与 1999 年关于人权的第 39 号《内部司法法》相关,则有悖于人权原则,因为它妨碍了工人获得更好工作和提高生活质量的权利。此外,在为同意在雇用合同中保留/提交文凭条款的工人提供法律保护方面,也有预防性和应对性的法律保护措施。这表明,对于此类条款中可能出现的侵犯工人权利的行为,已经采取了预防和应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信