ANALYZING THE DOUBLE CROSSOVER MOVING AVERAGES STRATEGY BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER THE LOCKDOWN PERIOD

F. Ghapar
{"title":"ANALYZING THE DOUBLE CROSSOVER MOVING AVERAGES STRATEGY BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER THE LOCKDOWN PERIOD","authors":"F. Ghapar","doi":"10.32890/ijbf2024.19.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trading is a business, not an investment. Traders focus on minor to secondary trends, while investors focus on the primary trend. Thetrading timeframe is crucial in technical analysis. As such a trader who trades with a minor trend timeframe, must have a trading strategy. We aim to examine the impact of the moving averages double crossover strategy on traders’ profit factor based on minor and secondary trend timeframes before, during and after the lockdown periods. Dow Theory was adopted for this study as a trend should be in effect until it gives a definite signal for a reversal. Data was collected from the Nasdaq Composite Index for a five-year period, from 2018 to 2022. During this time frame, the required data for the study was obtained at the point of the golden crossover and exiting at the dead crossover, in which 2018 to 2019 was the period before the lockdown, 2020 to 2021 was the period during lockdown, and 2022 was the year after lockdown. By using trading profits and loss for both longs and shorts, we back tested three strategies of double crossover moving averages that were as follows: i) EMA5 crossover EMA10, ii) EMA5 crossover EMA20 and iii) EMA20 crossover EMA50. A non-parametric analysis of independent samples was used. The result shows that there was a significant difference among those three strategies before the lockdown period, but no significant difference during and after the lockdown period.","PeriodicalId":34380,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Banking and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Banking and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2024.19.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trading is a business, not an investment. Traders focus on minor to secondary trends, while investors focus on the primary trend. Thetrading timeframe is crucial in technical analysis. As such a trader who trades with a minor trend timeframe, must have a trading strategy. We aim to examine the impact of the moving averages double crossover strategy on traders’ profit factor based on minor and secondary trend timeframes before, during and after the lockdown periods. Dow Theory was adopted for this study as a trend should be in effect until it gives a definite signal for a reversal. Data was collected from the Nasdaq Composite Index for a five-year period, from 2018 to 2022. During this time frame, the required data for the study was obtained at the point of the golden crossover and exiting at the dead crossover, in which 2018 to 2019 was the period before the lockdown, 2020 to 2021 was the period during lockdown, and 2022 was the year after lockdown. By using trading profits and loss for both longs and shorts, we back tested three strategies of double crossover moving averages that were as follows: i) EMA5 crossover EMA10, ii) EMA5 crossover EMA20 and iii) EMA20 crossover EMA50. A non-parametric analysis of independent samples was used. The result shows that there was a significant difference among those three strategies before the lockdown period, but no significant difference during and after the lockdown period.
分析锁定期之前、期间和之后的双交叉移动平均线策略
交易是一门生意,而不是投资。交易者关注的是次要趋势,而投资者关注的是主要趋势。交易时间框架在技术分析中至关重要。因此,使用次要趋势时间框架进行交易的交易者必须有一套交易策略。我们的目的是根据锁定期之前、期间和之后的次要和次要趋势时间框架,研究移动平均线双重交叉策略对交易者利润因素的影响。本研究采用道氏理论,因为趋势在发出明确的反转信号之前应一直有效。从纳斯达克综合指数中收集了从 2018 年到 2022 年的五年期数据。在这一时间段内,在黄金交叉点获取研究所需数据,在死叉点退出,其中 2018 年至 2019 年为锁定前,2020 年至 2021 年为锁定期间,2022 年为锁定后。通过多头和空头的交易盈亏,我们反向测试了以下三种双交叉移动平均线策略:i) EMA5交叉EMA10;ii) EMA5交叉EMA20;iii) EMA20交叉EMA50。使用的是非参数独立样本分析法。结果显示,这三种策略在锁定期之前存在显著差异,但在锁定期期间和之后没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信