{"title":"Becoming an image in the cinema: from Lessing and Hegel to S. Eisenstein","authors":"Liana Vladimirovna Popova","doi":"10.7256/2454-0625.2024.2.69723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The object of the study is the formation of an image in cinema. S.M. Eisenstein defined cinema as a comparison of two methods: the method of image and the method of figurative formation. The image in the cinema is the \"image of becoming\". The purpose of the study is to trace the evolution of views on the \"image of becoming\" from G. E. Lessing to G. V. F. Hegel and S. M. Eisenstein. The author refers to the origins of the formation of the \"image of becoming\", the teachings of G.E. Lessing and G.V.F. Hegel, who had a great influence on S.M. Eisenstein. G.E. Lessing determined that the methods of studying spatial and temporal arts are different. The method of image is a method inherent in spatial arts, the method of becoming is inherent in poetry as a temporary art. G.E. Lessing gave primacy to the method of becoming. G.V.F. Hegel dealt with a similar problem, he formed the doctrine of the \"image of becoming\" that arises in time. The research is based on the principle of image birth, developed by S.M. Eisenstein, according to whose teaching, an image is born in a montage. Comparative and semiotic methods are used in the study. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the research of the continuity of the doctrine of the \"image of becoming\", in the study of S. M. Eisenstein's innovation in this matter. According to S. Eisenstein, cinema is a synthetic, space-time art. It is associated with spatial arts, fine arts, architecture, sculpture, as well as with temporary ones: music, poetry. Cinematography is based on the \"Dionysus method\", which makes cinema related to other forms of play. According to S. Eisenstein, a movie frame is an assembly complex, it has its own design and composition, which makes it related to spatial types of art, as well as rhythm, which makes it related to the arts. Cinema is a complex system of images and signs. S.M. Eisenstein defines cinema as a field of language. The formation of an image in a movie takes place in time.\n","PeriodicalId":508990,"journal":{"name":"Культура и искусство","volume":"131 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Культура и искусство","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2024.2.69723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The object of the study is the formation of an image in cinema. S.M. Eisenstein defined cinema as a comparison of two methods: the method of image and the method of figurative formation. The image in the cinema is the "image of becoming". The purpose of the study is to trace the evolution of views on the "image of becoming" from G. E. Lessing to G. V. F. Hegel and S. M. Eisenstein. The author refers to the origins of the formation of the "image of becoming", the teachings of G.E. Lessing and G.V.F. Hegel, who had a great influence on S.M. Eisenstein. G.E. Lessing determined that the methods of studying spatial and temporal arts are different. The method of image is a method inherent in spatial arts, the method of becoming is inherent in poetry as a temporary art. G.E. Lessing gave primacy to the method of becoming. G.V.F. Hegel dealt with a similar problem, he formed the doctrine of the "image of becoming" that arises in time. The research is based on the principle of image birth, developed by S.M. Eisenstein, according to whose teaching, an image is born in a montage. Comparative and semiotic methods are used in the study. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the research of the continuity of the doctrine of the "image of becoming", in the study of S. M. Eisenstein's innovation in this matter. According to S. Eisenstein, cinema is a synthetic, space-time art. It is associated with spatial arts, fine arts, architecture, sculpture, as well as with temporary ones: music, poetry. Cinematography is based on the "Dionysus method", which makes cinema related to other forms of play. According to S. Eisenstein, a movie frame is an assembly complex, it has its own design and composition, which makes it related to spatial types of art, as well as rhythm, which makes it related to the arts. Cinema is a complex system of images and signs. S.M. Eisenstein defines cinema as a field of language. The formation of an image in a movie takes place in time.
研究对象是电影中形象的形成。爱森斯坦(S.M. Eisenstein)将电影定义为两种方法的比较:形象方法和具象形成方法。电影中的形象是 "成为的形象"。本研究的目的是追溯从 G. E. 莱辛到 G. V. F. 黑格尔和 S. M. 爱森斯坦关于 "成为的形象 "的观点的演变。作者提到了 "成为的形象 "形成的起源、G.E. 莱辛和 G.V.F. 黑格尔的学说,后者对 S.M. 爱森斯坦产生了巨大影响。G.E. 莱辛认为,研究空间艺术和时间艺术的方法是不同的。形象的方法是空间艺术所固有的方法,而成为的方法则是作为暂时艺术的诗歌所固有的方法。G.E. 莱辛把 "成为 "的方法放在首位。黑格尔(G.V.F. Hegel)也处理过类似的问题,他形成了在时间中产生的 "成为的形象 "学说。研究以 S.M. 爱森斯坦提出的 "形象诞生 "原则为基础,根据他的教导,形象诞生于蒙太奇之中。研究中使用了比较法和符号学方法。本研究的科学新颖性在于研究 "成为的形象 "学说的连续性,研究 S. M. 爱森斯坦在这一问题上的创新。爱森斯坦认为,电影是一种合成的时空艺术。它与空间艺术、美术、建筑、雕塑以及临时艺术(音乐、诗歌)相关联。电影摄影以 "狄俄尼索斯方法 "为基础,这使得电影与其他形式的游戏相关联。S. 爱森斯坦认为,电影画面是一个组合体,它有自己的设计和构成,这使它与空间类型的艺术以及节奏相关,这使它与艺术相关。电影是一个复杂的图像和符号系统。爱森斯坦(S.M. Eisenstein)将电影定义为语言领域。电影中的影像是在时间中形成的。