Sull'uso pubblico della storia in Gran Bretagna

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Andrea Mammone
{"title":"Sull'uso pubblico della storia in Gran Bretagna","authors":"Andrea Mammone","doi":"10.3280/pass2024-121004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"June 2016 marked the end of the British membership of the European Union. Rather than focusing on popular explanations for this «exit», such as immigration, economy, globalization and sovereignty, this article focuses on the role played by history in informing public and political debates. In particular, it shows how pre- existing patriotic myths were popularized, notably that of the empire and the belief that Britain had followed a unique historical path that was different from other European nations. Both were used to legitimize the vote to leave the European bloc. The article highlights how this situation influenced the rhetoric of a Global Britain and how some Eurosceptic historians legitimized this narrow historical exceptionalism.","PeriodicalId":38565,"journal":{"name":"Passato e Presente","volume":"1080 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passato e Presente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/pass2024-121004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

June 2016 marked the end of the British membership of the European Union. Rather than focusing on popular explanations for this «exit», such as immigration, economy, globalization and sovereignty, this article focuses on the role played by history in informing public and political debates. In particular, it shows how pre- existing patriotic myths were popularized, notably that of the empire and the belief that Britain had followed a unique historical path that was different from other European nations. Both were used to legitimize the vote to leave the European bloc. The article highlights how this situation influenced the rhetoric of a Global Britain and how some Eurosceptic historians legitimized this narrow historical exceptionalism.
关于英国历史的公共使用
2016 年 6 月标志着英国欧盟成员国身份的终结。这篇文章的重点不是移民、经济、全球化和主权等流行的 "退欧 "解释,而是历史在公众和政治辩论中所扮演的角色。特别是,文章展示了先前存在的爱国主义神话是如何流行起来的,尤其是帝国神话和英国走过了不同于其他欧洲国家的独特历史道路的信念。这两种说法都被用来使脱离欧洲集团的投票合法化。文章强调了这种情况如何影响了 "全球英国 "的言论,以及一些疑欧派历史学家如何将这种狭隘的历史例外论合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Passato e Presente
Passato e Presente Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信