Comparisons of Seismic Hazard Analysis Methods for Engineering Sites

Jun Song, Huiquan Miao, Zilan Zhong, Yanqiong Ding, Mi Zhao, Xiuli DU
{"title":"Comparisons of Seismic Hazard Analysis Methods for Engineering Sites","authors":"Jun Song, Huiquan Miao, Zilan Zhong, Yanqiong Ding, Mi Zhao, Xiuli DU","doi":"10.3724/j.gyjzg23120204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In view of the existing various seismic hazard analysis methods, the seismic hazard analysis method based on historical seismic intensity data and the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis method to analyze the seismic hazards of the main urban area in Beijing was taken, and the peak ground acceleration with a probability of exceeding 10% in 50 years was obtained. The results showed that the peak ground acceleration of the main urban area in Beijing was of obvious spatial variability, which was gradually increasing from the west of the city to the east; the results obtained from those two methods were reliable and the differences were slight. The methods had their own characteristics, the former had fewer assumptions including site effects and was moderately difficult to calculate","PeriodicalId":516737,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Construction","volume":"480 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/j.gyjzg23120204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: In view of the existing various seismic hazard analysis methods, the seismic hazard analysis method based on historical seismic intensity data and the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis method to analyze the seismic hazards of the main urban area in Beijing was taken, and the peak ground acceleration with a probability of exceeding 10% in 50 years was obtained. The results showed that the peak ground acceleration of the main urban area in Beijing was of obvious spatial variability, which was gradually increasing from the west of the city to the east; the results obtained from those two methods were reliable and the differences were slight. The methods had their own characteristics, the former had fewer assumptions including site effects and was moderately difficult to calculate
工程场地地震危害分析方法比较
:针对现有的各种地震危险性分析方法,采用基于历史地震烈度数据的地震危险性分析方法和概率地震危险性分析方法对北京主城区进行地震危险性分析,得出 50 年内地加速度峰值大于 10%的概率。结果表明,北京主城区地表加速度峰值具有明显的空间变异性,由城西向城东逐渐增大;两种方法所得结果可靠,差异较小。两种方法各有特点,前者包括场地效应在内的假设较少,计算难度适中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信