Efficacy and Safety of Paracervical Block in Reducing Intrauterine Device Insertion Related Pain : A Randomized Controlled Trial

ahmed khedr, Kariem El Etriby, Mariam Afifi
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Paracervical Block in Reducing Intrauterine Device Insertion Related Pain : A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"ahmed khedr, Kariem El Etriby, Mariam Afifi","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2023.246473.1273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of 20 ml of 1 % buffered lidocaine paracervical block to reduce pain during IUCD placement. Materials and Methods: In randomized single blinded controlled trial, women were assigned to receive either a 20 ml buffered lidocaine or no block before IUCD insertion. Enrollment occurred at family planning clinic, Badr University Hospital. The primary outcome was pain measured with a 100-mm visual analogue scale in various steps of IUD insertion. Results: From January to july 2021, 138 women were enrolled and distributed randomly into two equal groups: group I (intervention group) included 70 women received paracervical block before IUCD insertion in form of lidocaine injection, and group II (no intervention) included 68 women. There were no differences in demographic characteristics of both groups. Women who received the paracervical block reported less pain with IUD insertion compared to women who received no block( median VAS score of 20.9 mm versus 37.4 mm, p<0.001 ). Pain with tenaculum placement was less in intervention group (28.9mm versus 58.4mm, p <0.001 ). Pain with paracervical block administration was higher for intervention group compared to the no paracervical block group (18.4mm versus 10.9mm, p<0.001 ). The mean pain intensity felt 5 minutes after IUD placement was (5.9mm versus 16.9mm, p<0.001 ) which is statistically significant. The intensity of pain was similar and there was no statistically significant difference in the median VAS scores at baseline pain or pain with speculum insertion (51mm compared with 53.4 mm, p= 0.196 ). Conclusion : 20 ml lidocaine 1% paracervical block prior to copper T380A IUD insertion significantly decrease the related pain perception when compared with no block group.","PeriodicalId":12080,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","volume":"61 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2023.246473.1273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of 20 ml of 1 % buffered lidocaine paracervical block to reduce pain during IUCD placement. Materials and Methods: In randomized single blinded controlled trial, women were assigned to receive either a 20 ml buffered lidocaine or no block before IUCD insertion. Enrollment occurred at family planning clinic, Badr University Hospital. The primary outcome was pain measured with a 100-mm visual analogue scale in various steps of IUD insertion. Results: From January to july 2021, 138 women were enrolled and distributed randomly into two equal groups: group I (intervention group) included 70 women received paracervical block before IUCD insertion in form of lidocaine injection, and group II (no intervention) included 68 women. There were no differences in demographic characteristics of both groups. Women who received the paracervical block reported less pain with IUD insertion compared to women who received no block( median VAS score of 20.9 mm versus 37.4 mm, p<0.001 ). Pain with tenaculum placement was less in intervention group (28.9mm versus 58.4mm, p <0.001 ). Pain with paracervical block administration was higher for intervention group compared to the no paracervical block group (18.4mm versus 10.9mm, p<0.001 ). The mean pain intensity felt 5 minutes after IUD placement was (5.9mm versus 16.9mm, p<0.001 ) which is statistically significant. The intensity of pain was similar and there was no statistically significant difference in the median VAS scores at baseline pain or pain with speculum insertion (51mm compared with 53.4 mm, p= 0.196 ). Conclusion : 20 ml lidocaine 1% paracervical block prior to copper T380A IUD insertion significantly decrease the related pain perception when compared with no block group.
宫颈旁阻滞对减轻宫内节育器插入相关疼痛的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验
目的评估使用 20 毫升 1 % 缓冲利多卡因宫颈旁阻滞以减轻放置宫内节育器时疼痛的有效性和安全性。材料与方法:在随机单盲对照试验中,妇女被指定在放置宫内节育器前接受 20 毫升缓冲利多卡因或不接受阻滞。试验在巴德尔大学医院的计划生育诊所进行。主要结果是在插入宫内节育器的不同步骤中使用 100 毫米视觉模拟量表测量疼痛。结果:从 2021 年 1 月到 7 月,138 名妇女被随机分为两组:第一组(干预组)包括 70 名妇女,她们在插入宫内节育器前接受了利多卡因注射形式的宫颈旁阻滞治疗;第二组(无干预组)包括 68 名妇女,她们在插入宫内节育器前接受了利多卡因注射形式的宫颈旁阻滞治疗。两组的人口统计学特征无差异。与未接受宫颈旁阻滞的妇女相比,接受宫颈旁阻滞的妇女在放置宫内节育器时疼痛较轻(VAS评分中位数为20.9毫米对37.4毫米,P<0.001)。干预组在放置腱膜时的疼痛较轻(28.9 毫米对 58.4 毫米,P<0.001)。与无宫颈旁阻滞组相比,干预组宫颈旁阻滞时的疼痛程度更高(18.4 毫米对 10.9 毫米,P<0.001)。放置宫内节育器 5 分钟后的平均疼痛强度为(5.9 毫米对 16.9 毫米,P<0.001),具有统计学意义。疼痛强度相似,基线疼痛或窥器插入时疼痛的 VAS 评分中位数(51 毫米对 53.4 毫米,P= 0.196)无统计学差异。结论:与无阻滞组相比,在放置铜制 T380A 宫内节育器前进行 20 毫升 1%利多卡因宫颈旁阻滞可显著降低相关疼痛感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信