Geriatric Pain Protocol: Impact of Multimodal Pain Care for Elderly Orthopedic Trauma Patients

Paulina Andujo, Kelsey Yue, Karma McKelvey, Grant J. Dornan, Kathleen Breda
{"title":"Geriatric Pain Protocol: Impact of Multimodal Pain Care for Elderly Orthopedic Trauma Patients","authors":"Paulina Andujo, Kelsey Yue, Karma McKelvey, Grant J. Dornan, Kathleen Breda","doi":"10.1097/01.tpm.0001006236.14359.d2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hip fractures are costly, and associated complications are the leading cause of injury-related deaths in persons 65 years or older. Uncontrolled pain leads to increased hospital length of stay (LOS), delayed physical therapy, and long-term functional impairment. The Geriatric Pain Protocol (GPP) is Cedars-Sinai's multimodal pain management solution, addressing the needs of older adult inpatients who have suffered fractures. Study participants included hip fracture patients admitted between February 1, 2019, and March 5, 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients 65 years or older with a hip fracture sustained from a ground-level fall and surgical candidate. Participants were divided into 2 categories: Geriatric Fracture Program (GFP) and non-GFP, with physician participation in the GFP being the differentiating factor. End points included postoperative pain, postoperative opioid utilization, LOS, complications, and 30-day readmission rates. The GPP decreased morphine milligram equivalent (MME) daily totals on days 1 and 2 and improved pain management compared with non-GPP patients. MMEs were lower in the GPP group than in the non-GPP group for both postoperative day 1 (POD1) (P = 0.007) and POD2 (P = 0.043); the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score on POD1 was lower in the GPP group (vs non-GPP, P = 0.013). There were no group differences in NRS POD2 pain or complications (all Ps > 0.1). The study sample (N = 453) had no significant difference between sex and LOS (all Ps > 0.3). Although not statistically significant, the 30-day readmission rate trended lower in patients treated in accordance with the GPP. Use of the GPP reduced pain levels and MME totals.","PeriodicalId":215886,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Pain Management","volume":"68 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Pain Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tpm.0001006236.14359.d2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hip fractures are costly, and associated complications are the leading cause of injury-related deaths in persons 65 years or older. Uncontrolled pain leads to increased hospital length of stay (LOS), delayed physical therapy, and long-term functional impairment. The Geriatric Pain Protocol (GPP) is Cedars-Sinai's multimodal pain management solution, addressing the needs of older adult inpatients who have suffered fractures. Study participants included hip fracture patients admitted between February 1, 2019, and March 5, 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients 65 years or older with a hip fracture sustained from a ground-level fall and surgical candidate. Participants were divided into 2 categories: Geriatric Fracture Program (GFP) and non-GFP, with physician participation in the GFP being the differentiating factor. End points included postoperative pain, postoperative opioid utilization, LOS, complications, and 30-day readmission rates. The GPP decreased morphine milligram equivalent (MME) daily totals on days 1 and 2 and improved pain management compared with non-GPP patients. MMEs were lower in the GPP group than in the non-GPP group for both postoperative day 1 (POD1) (P = 0.007) and POD2 (P = 0.043); the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score on POD1 was lower in the GPP group (vs non-GPP, P = 0.013). There were no group differences in NRS POD2 pain or complications (all Ps > 0.1). The study sample (N = 453) had no significant difference between sex and LOS (all Ps > 0.3). Although not statistically significant, the 30-day readmission rate trended lower in patients treated in accordance with the GPP. Use of the GPP reduced pain levels and MME totals.
老年疼痛协议:多模式疼痛护理对老年骨科创伤患者的影响
髋部骨折代价高昂,相关并发症是 65 岁及以上人群因伤致死的主要原因。疼痛得不到控制会导致住院时间(LOS)延长、物理治疗延迟以及长期功能障碍。老年疼痛治疗方案(GPP)是西达-西奈医院的多模式疼痛管理解决方案,可满足老年骨折住院患者的需求。研究参与者包括2019年2月1日至2021年3月5日期间入院的髋部骨折患者。纳入标准为 65 岁或 65 岁以上、因地面摔倒导致髋部骨折的患者和手术候选者。参与者分为两类:老年骨折计划(Geriatric Fracture Program,GFP)和非老年骨折计划(Non-GFP),其中医生是否参与老年骨折计划是区分标准。终点包括术后疼痛、术后阿片类药物使用、住院时间、并发症和30天再入院率。与非 GPP 患者相比,GPP 降低了第 1 天和第 2 天的吗啡毫克当量(MME)日总量,并改善了疼痛管理。GPP 组术后第 1 天(POD1)(P = 0.007)和第 2 天(P = 0.043)的吗啡毫克当量(MME)均低于非 GPP 组;GPP 组术后第 1 天的数字评分表(NRS)疼痛评分也低于非 GPP 组(P = 0.013)。在 NRS POD2 疼痛或并发症方面没有组间差异(所有 Ps 均大于 0.1)。研究样本(N = 453)在性别和 LOS 方面没有显著差异(所有 Ps > 0.3)。虽然没有统计学意义,但按照 GPP 治疗的患者 30 天再入院率呈下降趋势。使用 GPP 降低了疼痛程度和 MME 总量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信