{"title":"STREETWALKING BEYOND THE STOA: DIOGENES THE CYNIC, MARÍA LUGONES, AND A TENTATIVE COSMOPOLITANISM","authors":"Erik Bormanis","doi":"10.54103/gjcpi.2023.2.22470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I argue that we should consider Diogenes the Cynic’s claim to be cosmopolitan in light of his homelessness as a spatial and material reality. I do this order to arrive at a concept of cosmopolitanism that is more politically and ethically substantial than its typical rationalist Kantian formulations. I consider passages from Diogenes Laertius’ Lives of the Eminent Philosophers to clarify the relationship of homelessness to cosmopolitanism, and draw upon authors such as Emmanuel Levinas, María Lugones, and José Medina in order to demonstrate the fruitfulness of a reconsidered cosmopolitanism in our contemporary context. I ultimately suggest that Diogenes’ cosmopolitanism offers a rich and politically charged alternative to rationalist cosmopolitanism insofar as he points us towards critically rethinking both the cosmos and polis as expressions of political agency in a world in which homelessness and social exclusion are a common feature. I argue that cosmopolitan political practice would therefore be best understood fundamentally tentative, whether in the form of productive negotiation, or an interruptive displacement of hegemonic understandings of shared spaces.","PeriodicalId":342668,"journal":{"name":"Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/gjcpi.2023.2.22470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this essay I argue that we should consider Diogenes the Cynic’s claim to be cosmopolitan in light of his homelessness as a spatial and material reality. I do this order to arrive at a concept of cosmopolitanism that is more politically and ethically substantial than its typical rationalist Kantian formulations. I consider passages from Diogenes Laertius’ Lives of the Eminent Philosophers to clarify the relationship of homelessness to cosmopolitanism, and draw upon authors such as Emmanuel Levinas, María Lugones, and José Medina in order to demonstrate the fruitfulness of a reconsidered cosmopolitanism in our contemporary context. I ultimately suggest that Diogenes’ cosmopolitanism offers a rich and politically charged alternative to rationalist cosmopolitanism insofar as he points us towards critically rethinking both the cosmos and polis as expressions of political agency in a world in which homelessness and social exclusion are a common feature. I argue that cosmopolitan political practice would therefore be best understood fundamentally tentative, whether in the form of productive negotiation, or an interruptive displacement of hegemonic understandings of shared spaces.
在这篇文章中,我认为我们应该根据犬儒第欧根尼的无家可归这一空间和物质现实,来考虑他的世界主义主张。我这样做是为了得出一个世界主义的概念,它比典型的理性主义康德式表述更具政治和伦理意义。我参考了第欧根尼-拉尔提乌斯(Diogenes Laertius)的《著名哲学家生平》(Lives of the Eminent Philosophers)中的一些段落,以澄清无家可归与世界主义的关系,并借鉴埃马纽埃尔-列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)、玛丽亚-卢戈内斯(María Lugones)和何塞-梅迪纳(José Medina)等作家的观点,以证明在当代背景下重新考虑世界主义所带来的丰硕成果。我最终认为,第欧根尼的世界主义为理性主义的世界主义提供了一个丰富的、具有政治色彩的替代选择,因为他指出,在无家可归和社会排斥成为普遍特征的世界中,我们应批判性地重新思考宇宙和政体作为政治机构的表现形式。因此,我认为,世界主义政治实践最好从根本上理解为试探性的,无论是以富有成效的谈判形式,还是以对共享空间的霸权理解的中断性置换形式。