Making assessment a team sport: a qualitative study of facilitated group feedback in internal medicine residency

H. Braund, N. Dalgarno, Rachel O'Dell, David R Taylor
{"title":"Making assessment a team sport: a qualitative study of facilitated group feedback in internal medicine residency","authors":"H. Braund, N. Dalgarno, Rachel O'Dell, David R Taylor","doi":"10.36834/cmej.75250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Competency-based medical education relies on feedback from workplace-based assessment (WBA) to direct learning. Unfortunately, WBAs often lack rich narrative feedback and show bias towards Medical Expert aspects of care. Building on research examining interactive assessment approaches, the Queen’s University Internal Medicine residency program introduced a facilitated, team-based assessment initiative (“Feedback Fridays”) in July 2017, aimed at improving holistic assessment of resident performance on the inpatient medicine teaching units. In this study, we aim to explore how Feedback Fridays contributed to formative assessment of Internal Medicine residents within our current model of competency-based training.\nMethod: A total of 53 residents participated in facilitated, biweekly group assessment sessions during the 2017 and 2018 academic year. Each session was a 30-minute facilitated assessment discussion done with one inpatient team, which included medical students, residents, and their supervising attending. Feedback from the discussion was collected, summarized, and documented in narrative form in electronic WBA forms by the program’s assessment officer for the residents. For research purposes, verbatim transcripts of feedback sessions were analyzed thematically.\nResults: The researchers identified four major themes for feedback: communication, intra- and inter-personal awareness, leadership and teamwork, and learning opportunities. Although feedback related to a broad range of activities, it showed strong emphasis on competencies within the intrinsic CanMEDS roles. Additionally, a clear formative focus in the feedback was another important finding.\nConclusions: The introduction of facilitated team-based assessment in the Queen’s Internal Medicine program filled an important gap in WBA by providing learners with detailed feedback across all CanMEDS roles and by providing constructive recommendations for identified areas for improvement.","PeriodicalId":503234,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Competency-based medical education relies on feedback from workplace-based assessment (WBA) to direct learning. Unfortunately, WBAs often lack rich narrative feedback and show bias towards Medical Expert aspects of care. Building on research examining interactive assessment approaches, the Queen’s University Internal Medicine residency program introduced a facilitated, team-based assessment initiative (“Feedback Fridays”) in July 2017, aimed at improving holistic assessment of resident performance on the inpatient medicine teaching units. In this study, we aim to explore how Feedback Fridays contributed to formative assessment of Internal Medicine residents within our current model of competency-based training. Method: A total of 53 residents participated in facilitated, biweekly group assessment sessions during the 2017 and 2018 academic year. Each session was a 30-minute facilitated assessment discussion done with one inpatient team, which included medical students, residents, and their supervising attending. Feedback from the discussion was collected, summarized, and documented in narrative form in electronic WBA forms by the program’s assessment officer for the residents. For research purposes, verbatim transcripts of feedback sessions were analyzed thematically. Results: The researchers identified four major themes for feedback: communication, intra- and inter-personal awareness, leadership and teamwork, and learning opportunities. Although feedback related to a broad range of activities, it showed strong emphasis on competencies within the intrinsic CanMEDS roles. Additionally, a clear formative focus in the feedback was another important finding. Conclusions: The introduction of facilitated team-based assessment in the Queen’s Internal Medicine program filled an important gap in WBA by providing learners with detailed feedback across all CanMEDS roles and by providing constructive recommendations for identified areas for improvement.
让评估成为一项团队运动:对内科住院医生小组反馈的定性研究
目的:基于能力的医学教育依赖于工作场所评估(WBA)的反馈来指导学习。遗憾的是,基于工作场所的评估往往缺乏丰富的叙述性反馈,而且偏重于医学专家的护理方面。基于对互动式评估方法的研究,女王大学内科住院医师培训项目于 2017 年 7 月推出了一项以团队为基础的协助式评估举措("周五反馈"),旨在改善住院医师在住院部教学单位的整体表现评估。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨 "反馈星期五 "如何在我们当前的能力本位培训模式下促进对内科住院医师的形成性评估:在 2017 和 2018 学年期间,共有 53 名住院医师参加了每两周一次的小组评估会议。每次会议由一个住院团队进行 30 分钟的协助评估讨论,其中包括医学生、住院医师及其指导主治医师。讨论中的反馈意见由项目评估官员收集、总结,并以叙述形式记录在住院医师的电子 WBA 表格中。出于研究目的,研究人员对反馈会议的逐字记录进行了专题分析:研究人员确定了四个主要的反馈主题:沟通、人内和人际交往意识、领导力和团队合作以及学习机会。虽然反馈意见涉及广泛的活动,但都非常重视 CanMEDS 内在角色的能力。此外,反馈中明确的形成性重点也是另一个重要发现:在女王内科学课程中引入基于团队的辅助评估,为学习者提供了涵盖所有 CanMEDS 角色的详细反馈,并为确定的改进领域提供了建设性建议,从而填补了 WBA 的重要空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信